A friend tells about how when he was a small boy his father’s birthday rolled around, and he did not realize it until it was too late to get his father a birthday present. So, he went through all his resources and came up with 17 cents. He put the dime, the nickel, and the two pennies in an envelope and gave it to his father with a note: “I love you, Dad. Happy Birthday. Thanks for being the best dad in the whole world. Sorry I did not get you a gift. This is all I’ve got.”
Years later, at his father’s death, when he was going through his father’s possessions, he discovered within a special compartment of his father’s wallet, the envelope, the note, the dime, the nickel, and the two pennies that his father had carried all those years. (Donald Shelby, “Love is Gratitude”).
Why? Why of all the things the father and son had experienced together was this token kept as the most precious reminder of their relationship? Why? It was pure love, and pure gratitude. And that’s what we have in our second Scripture lesson today.
They say that during your last days, especially when you are dying, your life flashes before you and your memory becomes a kind of motion picture recording of life. My notion is that if that was the case with Jesus, if during those three hours that He hung on the cross dying, if in the midst of that suffering inflicted by indifference, misunderstanding and hatred—if during that anguishing time of death, He remembered his pinnacle moments of love and gratitude, He would have remembered this experience that we have read about in our Scripture lesson.
Luke is the only Gospel writer who records the story and we’ll come back to that in a moment. Rehearse this poignant, dramatic event. The story is rather straightforward. A Pharisee—and don’t forget, a Pharisee was a good person. We tend to even say the word sneeringly—Pharisee. But Pharisees were good people; they were religious people. This Pharisee loved God, and sought to live according to God’s ways. He invited Jesus to come to his house for a meal and Jesus went. Homes in those days were apparently more open than they are now, so a woman was able to simply walk in off the street uninvited. Simon was not upset that an uninvited guest walked in; he was upset because of the kind of guest she was.
Can you put yourself in a similar situation? How would you feel if you were throwing a dinner party and three people you didn’t know came in and sat at the table? Or even sat on the floor at the feet of one of your guests? You can imagine that that was a little disconcerting.
It became even more disconcerting as the event evolved. While everyone was talking and eating and passing the time of day, this woman was weeping—weeping and her tears were falling on the feet of Jesus. And, what a sight! She was drying Jesus’ feet of the tears with her hair.
We are not told a great deal about this person. There has been some speculation, but it’s only speculation, that this was the woman caught in adultery whom Jesus spared from stoning. Whatever the case, she must have been someone who, at least, was aware of Jesus’ love and grace and was drawn to him uninvited. She was so overwhelmed by Jesus that she wept. Her tears were an expression of repentance, but also tears of overwhelming gratitude for who Jesus was and what Jesus could do for her.
I can imagine that Simon, the Pharisee, was baffled. He didn’t know what to do. So, he mumbled to himself: “My goodness. Jesus must not realize that this woman is a tramp off the street, a prostitute. If He realized who she was, He certainly wouldn’t allow her to sit near Him or even be present while He ate. I wonder if I should get the servants to come and take her out of the house.” In Simon’s mind, the woman polluted the whole atmosphere.
Now, Jesus either heard the man mumble to himself or knew what he was thinking, because he said, “Simon, listen, when I came into your house you didn’t follow the customary procedure of providing a place for me to wash my dusty feet. You didn’t extend to me much hospitality. You didn’t give me any oil for my hair, yet this woman came in, bathed my feet with her tears, and wiped my feet with her hair. And she has anointed me with perfume.”
“Simon, I want to ask you a question. If two debtors owed someone money—one owed a thousand dollars and one owed fifty, and the person forgave them both, who would be most grateful?”
Simon answered, “The one who was forgiven the greatest debt.”
Jesus responded, “You’re correct, Simon.” Then he turned to the woman and said, “Your sins are forgiven.”
It’s a dramatic story—one of the most dramatic in the New Testament. So, let’s get into some specific meanings the story has for us.
I.
Does it strike you as it does me? First, Jesus takes the side of the sinner. Isn’t that the most obvious fact in the story? He didn’t take the side of righteous Simon—He took the side of this woman of the street—the side of the sinner.
Nowhere in Scripture is this fact about Jesus more poignantly illustrated than in this story. Earlier in Luke, Jesus had stated it clearly. Remember? Luke 5:31-32: Jesus answered, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; I have come to call not the righteous but sinners to repentance.”
That states it clearly—in words—but now Jesus acts that out. Did you get that? Jesus not only stated it in words—“I have come to call not the righteous but sinners to repentance”—He acted it out. As I said a moment ago, Luke is the only one who records this story. He is also the only one who records Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son. I think there is significance in that. In both instances, in this story and in the story of the prodigal son, Jesus is seen clearly on the side of sinners.
That was hard for Simon to take. He was shocked by it, and we are still shocked, aren’t we? Isn’t it amazing. We forget why we are in the Church. What brought us here in the first place? Maybe we never think about it. Maybe we are here because we think that’s where decent people should be. Well, the church is a good place for decent people. Maybe here—in the church—our decency will become more than cultured good manners and middle-class notions of what is acceptable and proper. Maybe here our decency will become love and our love will burn with passion, which will express itself in compassion for those around us in the church, outside the church, and outside our proper social network.
It rolls off our tongues so easily. And it lends itself to a good sound bite in a modern media campaign: Open Hearts, Open Minds, Open Doors.
Open hearts—to a Gospel that will transform us.
Open minds—not a sloppy, sentimental, all-roads-lead-to-God stance that doesn’t reckon with the fact that what we believe makes a difference. Not an uncritical Pollyanna substitute for tolerance that says, “Believe what you please, as long as you are sincere.” Open minds: an honest respect for others and a valuing of them enough to enter into honest dialogue that will enable us to earn the right to confess our faith in the One who says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father but by Me.”
Open hearts, open minds, open doors. Open doors to whom? And to what?
Do we need to be shocked and re-shocked now and then—by stories like this one from our Scripture lesson and parables like the prodigal son—to stay aware that Jesus is on the side of sinners? And the Church is not the Church unless our ministry reflects that.
I had an experience at my Annual Conference a couple of years ago that took me aback. I had written all the ministers of the Conference, urging them to support a petition taking what I think is the moral high ground on sexuality issues, which would be coming before the General Conference.
A retired preacher was expressing his appreciation for my strong stand, but then he threw me a curve. He started talking about a preacher who had baptized a baby born outside of marriage. There was anger in his voice, condemnation. He used the word “bastard” as a label for this child. And there was venom in his voice as he talked about the father of the baby being present at the baptism. How could the preacher do it? Baptize this baby born out of wedlock and the father allowed to be present.
I thought I was talking to Simon the Pharisee, and I thanked God he was a retired, not an active, preacher.
I wondered. Had he missed that throughout his entire ministry? Open door to whom and to what? Christ is on the side of sinners!
On the side of AIDS victims? Yes.
On the side of those who traffic in human life, caught in the web of a drug culture that squeezes and smothers life to death? Yes.
On the side of those who abuse life because life has abused them? Child abusers? Wife abusers? Yes.
On the side of those who know themselves as sinners, and those who don’t? Yes.
That’s what grace is all about, and we’ll talk more about it tomorrow. For now, register this clearly: Jesus’ grace is so radical that it even risks being misunderstood as the affirmation of sin. Let me say that again. Jesus’ grace is so radical that it even risks being misunderstood as the affirmation of sin.
Do you see it? If that gets through to us, really gets through to us, then we will know that not only is it the sinner who is accepted— we so-called “righteous” are accepted as well.
That’s Good News!—That’s Good News for us righteous folks who don’t know what to do with our sexual lust and are often guilty of adultery. We are forgiven.
That’s Good News for us righteous folks—us righteous folks who back away from association with a lower class, knowing deep down that to even think in terms of a “lower class” hurts God’s heart. We are forgiven.
That’s Good News for us righteous folks who talk a good line about equality and concern for the poor, and education for all, yet who often feel the rage boiling up when we think about all the money we pay in taxes and all the people cheating the welfare system. We are forgiven!That’s Good News for us righteous folks who honor the family with our lips, and proclaim the family as the foundation of our culture, yet sacrifice our family at the altar of economic success or social position. We are forgiven!
Do you see? Christ is on the side of sinners. If that got through to us, we would know that righteous folks like us are accepted also. We, too, are forgiven, and we don’t have to trudge through life with all the burden of guilt that we righteous folks hardly ever confess to another.
II.
That leads to the second specific meaning this story has for us. Maybe it’s just another way of saying what we have already said. Jesus’ love is unconditional.
In this story—in Jesus’ words and actions—is demonstrated the radical gospel the church must incarnate.
Jesus does not forgive the woman, but he declares that she is forgiven. Let me say that again. He didn’t forgive the woman, but he declares that she is forgiven. Her state of mind, her ecstasy of love, show that something great has already happened to her. And nothing greater can happen to a human being than that he or she is forgiven. Forgiveness means reconciliation in spite of estrangement; it means reunion in spite of hostility; it means acceptance of those who are unacceptable; and it means reception of those who are rejected.
Forgiveness is unconditional, or it is not forgiveness at all. Forgiveness has the character of “in spite of,” but we righteous ones give it the character of “because.” That’s not it.. We are forgiven “in spite of” what we have done, not “because” of something we do. The Gospel puts the “in spite of” and the “because” together. “In spite of” all we are and have done, we are forgiven “because” Christ has done for us what we cannot do for ourselves.
So Jesus announces forgiveness. The woman was already forgiven, and she knew it. How that had come through to her, we don’t know. We suggested earlier that maybe this was the woman who had been saved from stoning when she was caught in the act of adultery. We don’t know that. But, it must have been that somehow she knew Jesus—and had been the recipient of His grace. Maybe she had heard Jesus preach. Maybe they had had a previous conversation. Or, maybe some others who had been forgiven by Jesus loved this woman unconditionally, and led her to accept Jesus’ forgiveness for herself.
However it happened, she knew it, and she was there showing her love, and the story closes with that clear word of Jesus’ teaching to Simon, verse 47:
Therefore, I tell you, her sins, which were many, have been forgiven; hence she has shown great love. But the one to whom little is forgiven, loves little.
We would do well to ponder the thought. If we are not loving much—if something is getting in the way of our loving others as we might, and should—maybe our sense of forgiveness is not keen enough. If we knew how much we are forgiven, would we love more?
Let’s be honest. We can understand Simon’s shock, can’t we? What is the nature of forgiveness anyway? Is it more than condoning sin? Try to put yourself in Simon’s place. Can we believe that the repentance of a woman of this kind is genuine and she has been transformed? Don’t we usually think quietly in our mind that such people will never be able to stay free of their sin; they will return to their former ways? That’s a real problem for us and the church. We don’t really take sin seriously. So, we see her kissing and anointing the Lord’s feet, her wiping his feet with her hair—we see that as emotion gone wild—we may even see it as worse. And we think in our mind, “It won’t last. She’ll be back to her old life before a month has passed.”
But, if you read on into the 8th chapter of Luke—following this story—you will find that Luke tells of Jesus continuing his preaching tours through villages and towns and up and down the countryside. And he tells us that there followed him certain women who spent their time, money, and energy, looking after Christ and his band of disciples. Could this woman have been one of them? These women were a mixed group; at least one of them, Luke tells us, came from a privileged class. But what they all had in common was gratitude for Jesus for having saved them from sin, delivered them of demons, and healed their diseases. Their gratitude was not just a rising tide of emotion, expressed at some momentous time—but it was a gratitude that expressed itself in tiresome, unromantic work of serving others. And it could well be that this woman who burst into Simon’s house was one of those women now serving the Lord.
So, we need to ponder the thought—if we knew how much we had been forgiven—would we be living any differently than we presently are? Let me say that again. If we knew how much we had been forgiven, would we be living any differently than we are?
Well, that’s at least a part of the meaning of this story. When you put it together with the story of Jeremiah buying land in Jerusalem when everything appeared doomed to destruction, you have an awesome challenge—open hearts, open minds, open doors—for risk-taking, the likes of which most of us have considered far too little.