Big Idea: Trust that God can overcome great difficulties.
Understanding the Text
The people had begun complaining at Taberah and Kibroth Hattaavah (Num. 11). At Hazeroth Moses’s own sister and brother had expressed resentment against Moses and undermined his spiritual authority (Num. 12). In each of these cases God had intervened with a mixture of punishment and grace. Now they come to Kadesh (or Kadesh Barnea) in the Desert of Paran (Num. 13:26) just south of the land of Canaan.
Israel has not learned its lesson from the events of Numbers 11–12. After sending scouts on a reconnaissance mission into the land of Canaan and hearing the majority opinion that the land would be impossible to conquer, the Israelites again rebel against God and Moses. This rebellion will prove pivotal in Israel’s failure to live up to its calling and achieve its goal of entering the land.
Interpretive Insights
13:2 Send some men to explore the land of Canaan. Deuteronomy 1:22–23 indicates that the Israelites had asked Moses to send scouts to spy out the land. God’s command here is thus a response to the people’s request.
13:4 These are their names. The tribal leaders listed in Numbers 13:4–15 are different from the ones specified in Numbers 1:5–15.
13:16 Moses gave Hoshea son of Nun the name Joshua. Joshua’s original name was Hoshea (vv. 8, 16), meaning “He [God?] saves.” Joshua (Yehoshua) means “Yahweh is salvation.” Both are similar in meaning, but only “Joshua” refers explicitly to Yahweh. Joshua probably had not been renamed yet when he was a spy.1 Perhaps Joshua was renamed when he was designated as Moses’s heir apparent (Num. 27:12–23), akin to the throne names of kings.
13:17 Negev. The Negev is an arid desert and semidesert region from Beersheba south that is not quite as desolate as the Desert of Paran. Negev in Hebrew means “dry.” This area later became southern Judah.
hill country. This is the mountainous backbone of the land of Canaan that goes north through what would become the territories of Judah, Benjamin, and Ephraim.
13:21 Desert of Zin. Zin is north of the Desert of Paran and Kadesh, from which the scouts are sent.
Rehob, toward Lebo Hamath. Rehob is a city in the vicinity of Lebo Hamath that can be identified with Laboue or Al Labweh in modern Lebanon. This is some 270 miles north of Kadesh, where the scouts begin. Lebo Hamath marks the northern border of Canaan (Num. 34:8) and was the northernmost city of David and Solomon’s empire (1 Chron. 13:5; 1 Kings 8:65).
13:22 Hebron. This is the first major fortified city that Israelite invaders would have encountered. The text emphasizes its antiquity. Hebron was seven years older than the sometimes Egyptian capital city of Zoan (also known as Tanis) in the region where the ten plagues had occurred (Ps. 78:12; Isa. 19:11, 13).
Ahiman, Sheshai and Talmai. These individuals or subtribes are members of the Anakites (discussed in v. 33 below). Four decades later Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai are driven out of Hebron by the spy Caleb (Josh. 15:14; Judg. 1:10, 20), whose descendants then occupy Hebron.
13:23 Valley of Eshkol. In Hebrew this means the “Valley of [Grape] Cluster.” It is located near Hebron in the central hill country of what became Judah.
grapes . . . pomegranates and figs. The scouts determine the number, location, and fortifications of the enemy, but they also show that the land is worth the fight by bringing back some of its abundant produce.
13:25–26 they returned . . . they reported. That the scouts’ report is delivered also to “the whole Israelite community” does not indicate every Israelite, since it would have been impossible for six hundred thousand men to gather for such a meeting; rather, it indicates a body of representative tribal leaders (see comments at Num. 1:18).
13:27 the land . . . does flow with milk and honey! This is not so much an idyllic description, except in comparison to the desert, as a categorization of what kind of land this is. This land is good for herds of cattle and goats that produce milk and is good for producing sweet things. It is not necessarily good for other kinds of agriculture. “Honey” (debash) is not limited to bee’s honey but includes other sweets such as date or grape syrup. Honey in Deuteronomy 8:8 probably refers to date syrup. Nonetheless, direct archaeological evidence of bee domestication and bee honey harvesting in ancient Israel was found in 2005 at Tel Rehov dating to the tenth or early ninth century BC.2
13:28 The people . . . are powerful . . . the cities are fortified and very large. This is the negative side of their report.
descendants of Anak. This foe around Hebron (v. 22) is likely the first that Israel would face when invading from Kadesh.
13:29 Amalekites . . . Hittites . . . Jebusites . . . Amorites . . . Canaanites. The entire area is swarming with enemies from south (Negev) to north (the hill country), from west (near the Mediterranean Sea) to east (along the Jordan). Israel had already fought with the desert-dwelling “Amalekites” (Exod. 17:8–16). In Abraham’s day “Hittites” occupied the area around Hebron (Gen. 23), though they appear to have been supplanted there by Anakites. The Canaanite-speaking Hittites of the Bible probably are not related to the non-Semitic Hittites based in what is now Turkey who in the thirteenth century fought with Egypt for control of the Levant. Rather, they are a Canaanite tribe (Gen. 10:15) with a similar-sounding name. The “Jebusites” occupied Jerusalem (Judg. 1:21), which they called “Jebus” (Judg. 19:10; 1 Chron. 11:4), eighteen miles north of Hebron, until David defeated them (2 Sam. 5:6–8). The term “Amorites” is used in Akkadian in Mesopotamia for “westerners” (in the direction of Syria), some of whom apparently migrated south into the Transjordan (Deut. 1:44) and the hill country of central Canaan (Gen. 48:22), though “Amorite” is sometimes used of the entire population of Canaan (Gen. 15:16). The “Canaanites” are descendants of the son of Ham, whose sexual sin concerning Noah condemned Canaan’s descendants to subservience to Shem (fulfilled through Israel) (Gen. 9:18–27). “Canaanite,” like “Amorite,” can be used of the entire population of the land of Canaan. Canaan was the father of the Hittites, the Jebusites, and the Amorites just mentioned (Gen. 10:15–19), though here “Canaanites” refers to a subtribe that lived along the Jordan River valley and the Mediterranean Sea (Num. 13:29).
13:30 Caleb silenced the people. The sole voice initially against the majority is Caleb, though Joshua later supports him (Num. 14:6–9). Why Joshua is silent here is not stated. Is he still making up his mind? Or does Caleb simply take the lead in the debate with Joshua silently supportive?
13:32 The land . . . devours those living in it. This reference to constant warfare among the Canaanite peoples finds extrabiblical support from the fourteenth-century BC letters from Canaanite vassals to Egyptian pharaohs in the Amarna tablets.
13:33 Nephilim. The Nephilim of Genesis 6:4 are the “heroes / mighty men of old” during the days when the “sons of God” had married the “daughters of men” (Gen. 6:1–4). Some take the Nephilim there to be the offspring of angels (“sons of God”) and humans (“daughters of men”), so that these Nephilim are superhuman figures. Perhaps the scouts view the Anakites, who are especially tall as a race (v. 32; cf. Deut. 2:10, 21), as demigods descended from the Nephilim of Genesis, invincible to Israelite attacks. How under this view the Nephilim could have survived the flood of Noah is not explained. Alternatively, nepilim may mean “marauders, attackers, violent men,” a class of warriors whose brutal activities help bring on the judgment of the flood.3 To the scouts, the Anakite warriors seem of the same powerful and violent character as the legendary Nephilim of Genesis.
We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes. In comparison with these tall and mighty warriors, the scouts feel puny and subject to being squashed.
14:1–4 the community . . . wept . . . grumbled. The majority report brings despair and discontent, and it results in a call to return to Egypt. Grumbling against Moses is a recurring theme (Exod. 15:24; 16:2; 17:3; Num. 16:2, 41; 21:5; 26:9).
14:5 Moses and Aaron. As Israel’s top spiritual leaders, Moses and Aaron, along with Joshua and Caleb (v. 6), try to calm the people.
fell facedown. This is often the posture of prayer or worship (see Lev. 9:24), but here it represents begging the people to reconsider.
14:6 Joshua . . . Caleb. These two have been among the scouts (Num. 13:6, 8). Caleb gives the minority report encouraging Israel to begin the conquest (Num. 13:30).
tore their clothes. This gesture of distress shows their seriousness (cf. Gen. 37:29, 34; 44:13; Josh. 7:6).
14:8 If the Lord is pleased with us. Success in the conquest is conditional. Rebellion against God can forfeit his favor (v. 9a).
a land flowing with milk and honey. See comments at Numbers 13:27 above.
Theological Insights
Only by faith could God’s people actually be guided by God. God directs Moses to send the scouts into the land (Num. 13:1–3), and Joshua and Caleb correctly understand that God would bring them victory over mighty enemies (Num. 14:8–9). But God’s actions can seem mysterious or even malevolent. To the people, God seems intent on killing them (Num. 14:3). The difference in perspective is faith: Joshua and Caleb view God positively through the lens of faith, the people negatively through the lens of unbelief.
The importance of faith in God is also prominent in the New Testament. Indeed, a whole chapter, Hebrews 11, is devoted to it. Faith allows believers to “move mountains” (Matt. 17:20), resist the devil (1 Pet. 5:8–9), and overcome the world (1 John 5:4), whereas unbelief produces the opposite effects, then and now.
Teaching the Text
1. Don’t be paralyzed by great obstacles to God’s plan. The twelve scouts have much in common. Each of them is a leader of his tribe (Num. 13:1–16). Each is given the same forty-day reconnaissance mission to explore the land and determine the strength, position, and fortifications of the enemy (13:17–19). They have seen the same land and its fruitfulness (13:20). But two of the twelve scouts, Joshua and Caleb, stand apart from the others.
Everyone agrees that the land is a land that “does flow with milk and honey” (13:27). But ten of the twelve scouts focus on a more disturbing aspect of the land: the powerful enemies. Every part of the country is chock-full of formidable foes. Hebron, the first city that Israel will face, is occupied by the descendants of Anak (13:28). The Anakites are an intimidating, tall race (Deut. 2:10, 21) that the scouts associate with the powerful Nephilim of Genesis 6:1–4. In comparison with them, the scouts feel puny and impotent (Num. 13:31, 33).
Fear is a common emotion to which we are all too prone. That is why the Bible must reassure us so often. One of the most frequent exhortations in the Bible is “Do not be afraid.” We are by nature fearful creatures. When we focus on great obstacles in life, we are likely to be overcome with fear and paralyzed into inaction. However, God’s people should be characterized not by debilitating fear but rather by courage based on their faith in God. That is what Caleb and Joshua show us.
2. Focus on the greatness of God. Caleb and Joshua concentrate on the greatness of God, not the enemies. The conquest is not impossible. Caleb affirms, “We should go up and take possession of the land, for we can certainly do it” (13:30). Joshua may have taken a little longer to make up his mind or have kept silent at first because “his close affiliation with Moses would have discredited his opinion,”4 but ultimately he affirms Caleb’s viewpoint in support of Moses and Aaron. To both Caleb and Joshua, the issue is not the greatness of the enemies but rather the greatness of God.
The name Joshua (Yehoshua, “Yahweh saves”) given him by Moses (13:16) reflects faith in God’s ability to save. Joshua and Caleb affirm, “If the Lord is pleased with us, he will lead us into that land . . . and will give it to us” (Num. 14:8–9). God has promised Israel the land. God will carry through with his promises unless the people rebel (14:9).
A remedy for fear is faith in God. Through faith in God we can move mountains (Matt. 17:20; 1 Cor. 13:2). Through faith we can have the courage to act, to confront obstacles, and to accomplish much for God. But fear cannot solve a problem or overcome a difficulty. Fear leads to indecisiveness, confusion, and reluctance to attempt to do things for God. If we are to overcome life’s difficulties and fulfill God’s will for our lives, we must rely on God to enable us to carry out the tasks he has given us. God is sufficient and trustworthy, and we are in his hands. We must in faith concentrate on the greatness of God, not the greatness of our problems.
Illustrating the Text
Fear is the enemy of faith.
Nature: On February 12, 2014, car lovers everywhere gasped in horror when they woke to their morning news: an enormous sinkhole had opened up beneath the floor of a museum devoted to classic Corvettes. Eight of the cars had disappeared into the hole!
Sinkholes are formed as groundwater slowly erodes bedrock. Everything on the surface can look safe and stable, but underneath a great hole is being formed. At the right (or wrong!) moment, the hole can open up, swallowing homes, streets, even Corvettes.
Fear is like an acid to faith. When we fear, we are looking toward a future we cannot control. We are anticipating terrible outcomes. Ultimately, we are taking our lives out of God’s hands and placing the responsibility for our protection into our own. Faith, on the other hand, trusts in the God who has called us his own and promises to work all things together for our good (Rom. 8:28).
When left unchecked, fear works beneath the surface of our lives. On the surface, the “ground level,” we seem to believe the same things, sing the same songs, do the same deeds. But underneath, fear slowly erodes the bedrock of confident faith. When circumstances arise that challenge us to exercise faith, a life lived in fear will collapse. That is why we must identify areas in our lives that are infected with it. Do we fear people more than God? Do we fear the future rather than faithfully trusting the sovereign Lord? If so, beware: a sinkhole might be forming.
Big Idea: Disobedience can bring about forfeiture of God’s blessings.
Understanding the Text
Numbers 14 constitutes the tragic climax of the Israelites’ grumbling and rebelliousness. They send scouts into the land (Num. 13), but the majority have concluded that the enemy is too powerful to conquer. The people are again in revolt and ready to go back to Egypt (Num. 14:1–9). This rebellion will come to be listed as pivotal in Israel’s failure to live up to its calling and achieve its goal of entering the land (Deut. 1:26–45). God threatens to annihilate Israel as he threatened previously during the incident of the golden calf (Exod. 32:10; Num. 14:12), for these two events represent the most egregious moral failures of Israel in the desert.
Interpretive Insights
14:10 the whole assembly talked about stoning them. “Talked about” could mean “thought about” or “threatened to” (NRSV).
the glory of the Lord appeared. God ominously manifests himself as a fire cloud (Exod. 16:10; 40:34–35; Num. 16:42) in the midst of this crisis.
14:11 they refuse to believe . . . in spite of all the signs. Israel has experienced the ten plagues, the parting of the Red Sea, and the miraculous provision of manna and quail, yet it lacks faith.
14:12 I will strike them down . . . and destroy them. This could be rendered “Let me strike them down . . . and let me destroy them,”1 or as an expression of wish or intention: “I wish to” or “I am about to” instead of “I will.” God asks for Moses’s approval to destroy Israel—as at the golden calf incident (Exod. 32:10)—to get him to intercede in prayer.
I will make you into a nation greater and stronger than they. God can keep the patriarchal promises (Gen. 12:2) through Moses.
14:13–14 the Egyptians will hear . . . they will tell the inhabitants of this land. Moses responds by interceding for Israel. Destroying Israel would ruin God’s reputation among the Egyptians and the Canaanites.
14:16 The Lord was not able . . . he promised them on oath. Non-Israelites would conclude that Israel’s God is lacking in power or in integrity or both: God cannot keep his solemn oath giving Israel the land or lacks the integrity to do so or both.
14:19 forgive the sin of these people. Moses begs God not to destroy Israel because of its sins, but instead to act in accord with God’s gracious and loving character as described in Exodus 34:6–7. For more, see “Theological Insights” below.
14:20 I have forgiven them. God’s response, like God’s character itself, is a mixture of holiness and mercy. On the merciful side, God agrees not to destroy Israel (cf. v. 12).
14:21 Nevertheless. God’s holiness limits forgiveness to commuting the sentence rather than eliminating all punishment of this “wicked community” (vv. 27, 35).
as surely as I live. Having no other god to swear to, Yahweh swears on his own life and glory, symbolically raising his hand in oath (v. 30).
14:22 tested me ten times. “Ten times” probably is idiomatic for “repeatedly, over and over again,” though the rabbis did come up with a list of ten specific occasions of rebellion in the previous narratives of Exodus and Numbers: (1) at the Red Sea (Exod. 14:11–12), (2) at Marah (Exod. 15:23), (3) at the wilderness of Sin (Exod. 16:2), (4) at Rephidim (Exod. 17:1), (5) at Horeb with the golden calf (Exod. 32), (6) at Taberah (Num. 11:1), (7) at the “graves of craving” (Num. 11:4), (8) at Kadesh (Num. 14), and twice of some individuals at the giving of manna (9) who save it overnight (Exod. 16:20) and (10) who look for it on the Sabbath (Exod. 16:27).2
14:25 Amalekites . . . Canaanites. These are the first enemies that Israel will face invading from the south. They have already fought with Amalek in the desert (Exod. 17:8–16).
route to the Red Sea. That is, the way from which they came.
14:30 Not one of you will enter the land . . . except Caleb . . . and Joshua. Because Caleb is the spy who has encouraged Israel to go ahead and begin the conquest (vv. 24, 38; cf. Num. 13:30; 14:6) and Joshua is the only spy to have agreed with Caleb (vv. 30, 38; cf. Num. 14:6), they are spared Israel’s fate and will live to enter the land. In an act of poetic justice, Caleb will even be given possession of that fortified city of Hebron, whose inhabitants, the Anakites, the ten scouts had so feared (cf. Josh. 14:6–15). Moses and Aaron (v. 26), along with Aaron’s sons, are also (for now) exempt from this exclusion from entering the land, for no Levite had been among the unfaithful scouts, and Aaron has supported Moses, Joshua, and Caleb against the mob (14:5–6). Moses and Aaron are later excluded from entering the land (see Num. 20:12, 24). Aaron’s son Eleazar, presumably over the age of twenty at this time, is allowed to enter the land (Josh. 24:33).
14:31 your children . . . enjoy the land. Literally, they will “know, experience” the land.
14:33 forty years. This forty-year condemnation to living seminomadically in the desert corresponds symbolically to the time (forty days) that the scouts had investigated the land (v. 34; cf. 13:25). Forty years ensured that all the adults twenty or more years old would die before Israel entered Canaan (see vv. 29, 32–33). Ironically, the Israelites will get what they wished for: they had exclaimed, “If only we had died . . . in this wilderness” (Num. 14:2) and are afraid that they will “fall by the sword” (14:3), so in this wilderness they will fall dead (vv. 28–29). The ten scouts who spread the bad report die more immediately of a divine plague (vv. 36–37).
unfaithfulness. This is literally “harlotry,” referring to the spiritual harlotry of unbelief and disobedience.
14:35 I, the Lord, have spoken. God’s decision is final: Moses should not bother to intercede further.
14:40 we are ready to go up to the land. Having mourned bitterly (v. 39) and confessed their sin, the people now agree to go and take the land, but by doing so they now are in violation of God’s new command to turn back toward the desert (v. 25; cf. Deut. 1:42). The attack will fail because Yahweh is not with them (vv. 42–43). God’s sentence against them is final (cf. v. 35).
14:44 neither Moses nor the ark . . . moved from the camp. Invading without God’s appointed leader, Moses, and God’s presence, symbolized by his throne the ark (see comments at Lev. 16:2), proves futile.
14:45 Hormah. Hormah’s location is unknown, but fittingly its Hebrew name means “destruction.” Thus begin the forty years of wilderness wanderings.
Theological Insights
Moses’s prayer in Numbers 14 conveys these theological truths about God’s grace and God’s holiness, truths that are, as it turns out, somewhat in tension with one another. On the one hand, “The Lord is slow to anger, abounding in love and forgiving sin and rebellion” (14:18a), but on the other hand, God “does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation” (14:18b).
“Love” (hesed) encompasses the love, grace, mercy, loyalty, faithfulness, and the like that one shows to someone with whom one has a relationship. In pointing out that God abounds in hesed, or “covenant love,” Moses is beseeching God to act in love and mercy in view of his covenant relationship with Israel despite its sin. In Exodus 34:6, after Israel has made the golden calf, “God’s love takes the shape of mercy and grace, of abstaining from anger and of being ready to forgive the thousands (i.e., numerous) of generations without any limit, although the punishment restricted to four generations would not fail to come.”3 In the incident of the golden calf, God had forgiven Israel’s sin—that is, a veering from God’s norms, specifically the commandment about images in the Decalogue. At Kadesh Israel had shown something else: rebellion against God’s command (Num. 14:9). But Exodus 34:7 says that God forgives that too.
However, God’s grace is in tension with his holiness, which “does not leave the guilty unpunished” (v. 18b). How can God be simultaneously gracious and holy with sinful people?
Moses does not resolve the theological tension between God’s holiness and God’s grace, a tension that is resolved in Christ (cf. Rom. 3:26). Moses merely prays that God choose to act on the basis of his gracious side (v. 19). And God answers that prayer: he does not destroy Israel (14:20), though in holiness he condemns that generation to the wilderness (vv. 21–35).
God, while holy, is inclined to forgiveness and grace. We, like Moses, can pray that God act on the basis of his grace.
Teaching the Text
1. Intercessory prayer is powerful. Although this passage is not intended to teach us how to pray, it shows several features of how Moses prayed for Israel that are suggestive for how we might pray.
We should pray out of love. God’s people are not always very lovable. Moses’s people had grumbled and complained and at times challenged his leadership. But despite all the people’s faults and failings, Moses loves them, and he expresses that love through fervent prayer that God have mercy on them (14:19). We can do the same.
We should pray on the basis of God’s honor. Moses does not pray selfishly. He prays on the basis of God’s honor and glory. God’s honor is intimately tied to his people, with whom he has made a covenant. In a sense, if God’s people fail, God’s great investment in them will fail also. That failure would ruin God’s reputation among the gentiles (14:13–14).
Destroying Israel would bring into question God’s power. Is God really “able to bring these people into the land he promised them on oath” (14:16a)? If not, it would raise doubts about God’s faithfulness to his word. Moses wants to protect God’s reputation. So should we.
We should also pray on the basis of God’s grace. Some might suppose that God here is unreasonably harsh, and it took a compassionate human (Moses) to rein him in, but that is not accurate. This is the second time that Moses has prayed for God not to destroy Israel. The other time is in Exodus 32:9–14, at the making of the golden calf. Shortly after that incident God revealed something of his character as a compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness and yet holy (Exod. 34:6–7). Moses prays with the assurance of God’s self-revelation that God is more inclined to forgive than to condemn. Arguably, God, who is omniscient, reveals his plans to Moses specifically to provoke Moses to pray for his people so that God can show mercy in response. In any case, God answers Moses’s prayer by sparing Israel (v. 20), showing both the power of intercessory prayer and the extent of God’s grace.
2. Some consequences of sin are potentially irrevocable. The people have provoked God repeatedly since departing from Egypt (v. 22). God in his mercy has limited the punishment, but God’s patience has now run out. This is the last straw. God forgives them (v. 20) in that he will not annihilate them. But since God “does not leave the guilty unpunished” (v. 18), the Israelites will not enter the promised land until after they have wandered in the wilderness for forty years. God’s promises are delayed and forfeited by a whole generation of Israelites. Even when some in part repent and agree to enter the land (v. 40), the damage has been done. It is too late.
Sin can have irrevocable consequences for us too. If you commit murder, repentance can bring God’s forgiveness, as it does for David, who has Uriah killed so that he can take his wife (2 Sam. 12:13). But it cannot bring back from death the person killed. Nor will it necessarily keep you from being punished. David himself suffers loss, despite God’s forgiveness (2 Sam. 12:11, 14). If you commit adultery and repent, God will forgive you, but your reputation may be sullied for years, and you may have so damaged your relationship with your spouse that you end up divorced. Lying or theft can get you fired at work and ruin your career. Sin can result in forfeiting some of God’s blessings, even if we later repent and God forgives us.
Illustrating the Text
We should always hold God’s holiness and grace in tension.
Informational: The rabbis recognized the tension between God’s holiness and God’s grace, as did Moses. Rosh Hashanah occurs on the first day of the month of Tishri. According to the rabbis of the Leviticus Rabbah, on Rosh Hashanah God sits on his “throne of judgment” and condemns people for their sins and failings. But upon the sounding of the trumpet marking the beginning of the year (Lev. 23:24), God rises up from his throne of judgment and sits on his throne of mercy, from which he reverses his judgments pronounced from the throne of judgment and forgives the world.4 Thus the rabbis taught that God’s mercy and grace are greater than God’s judgment. Moses’s prayer in Numbers 14:10–19 also assumes that God’s mercy is greater than his judgment. And thus, despite God’s characteristic of holiness, Moses can pray for God to graciously forgive Israel.
Sometimes the consequences of sin are irrevocable.
True Story: In 2009 Donté Stallworth, a wide receiver for the Cleveland Browns football team, unintentionally killed Mario Reyes, a fifty-nine-year-old construction crane operator. Stallworth, driving while intoxicated, hit Reyes with his car when Reyes was walking across a street in Miami. Afterward, Stallworth was burdened with the guilt of having done “irreparable harm” to the family of the man he killed, and he apologized for his “poor judgment.”5 But even if Stallworth were ever forgiven by the man’s family, or forgiven by the NFL after a year’s suspension from the league, or even forgiven by God, Mario Reyes remains dead because of Stallworth’s foolish behavior. Stallworth has to live with the guilt of that choice. His sin has an irrevocable consequence.
Sin has consequences, sometimes permanent consequences. For that reason, we should never allow God’s willingness to forgive to be a license for going ahead and sinning. We may be forgiven our sin, but, as Israel learned, some blessings from God may be permanently forfeited nevertheless.