Senator William Proximire (D-Wisconsin) regularly delights the general public by awarding his now-famous "Golden Fleece Award" to some government committee or agency which, because of some redundant high-dollar project, has achieved recognition for excelling in flagrant, wasteful, unnecessary spending. Senator Proximire gets our attention because he illuminates a subject of interest to us all: how money is spent. We do not like to spend more than we have to and have little tolerance for irresponsible, reckless spending wherever it occurs. "Throwing money out in the yard" and "pouring sand down a rat hole" are expressions which we hope to successfully avoid having applied to ourselves. It really doesn't matter whether we speak of it as stewardship, frugality, or practicality. Wasteful spending is offensive to anyone who attempts to be responsible with personal resources.
Extravagance
Extravagance, or even what appears to be extravagance, does not go down well. We need to remember that whether we read of the woman anointing Jesus' head (Matthew 26:6f) or the woman anointing his feet (Luke 7:36f). It has been suggested that the two accounts refer to the same incident. I do not know. However, I do know this:
The anointing recorded by Matthew occurred at Bethany. In Luke it was the city of Nain.In Matthew, the host is Simon the Leper. In Luke, Simon the Pharisee.Matthew refers to "a woman." Luke calls her "a woman of the streets."In Matthew, the woman pours the ointment over Jesus' head. In Luke, the ointment is applied to his feet.In Matthew, the disciples whine about wasted perfume. In Luke, the Pharisee mutters under his breath about Jesus wasting his time and emotion on an 'undeserving' woman.
Both accounts contain complaints about that thing which is near and dear to each of us: wasted resources! Consequently, let us not be too nasty in our condemnation of the disciples and the Pharisee. They were only making justifiable observations. They did have a point. We will allow that.
We will part company now with Matthew's account and take up the woman in Luke who washed Jesus' feet with her tears, dried them with her hair, and anointed them with ointment. How could she be so bold as to intrude into the residence of a monitor of righteousness? The contrast between her and others in the room would be immediately disconcerting. Why such an extravagant outpouring at that particular time? (How would you feel if you were entertaining a guest in your home and someone barged in uninvited and unannounced, not to see you, but your guest, and proceeded to rearrange the agenda? Why did she feel so constrained to be attentive to Jesus when the righteous Pharisee had neglected to be totally courteous?
The Intrusion
It was an intrusion, no doubt about that. Rudeness, however, is not nearly so prominent here as is determination, perhaps even desperation. When one's mind is locked-in on a single thought and the will is riveted to the pursuit of that thought, social niceties and topical etiquette are not always observed. Just because the woman was of ill repute is no sign that she did not know how to be civil. Apparently, she had only one thing on her mind: getting to Jesus. Why? It is rather commonly held among commentators that the fact the woman came "prepared" to anoint Jesus indicates that the incident was not just a spontaneous burst of emotion. In all likelihood, she had heard Jesus preach, witnessed a miracle, or had her life touched in some manner by him to the point of experiencing forgiveness of her sins. Full of joyful gratitude, and determined to do something for the one who had done so much for her, she made straightway for Jesus.
There is an old story about the Greek Marathon. Muscular, conditioned runners paced nervously near the starting line for the long-distance race. The time was near. They "shook out" their muscles, inhaled deeply, and put on their "game faces." In the midst of it all, a young stranger took his place at the starting line. His physique was awesome. Taking no notice of the other contestants, he stared straight ahead. Two prizes would be awarded the winner of the Marathon: a magnificent bouquet of flowers and the honor of standing beside the king until the conclusion of other contests. There seemed to be no question among the runners about who would win the prize. It is alleged that the stranger was offered money not to run. Someone else attempted to bribe him with property. Refusing the offers, he toed the mark and awaited the signal to run. When the signal was given, he was the first away. At the finish line, he was the first to cross, well ahead of the rest. When it was all done, someone asked the young man if he thought the flowers were worth as much as the money and property he had refused. He replied, "I did not enter the race for the flowers. I ran so that I could stand beside my king!"
Again, the woman who "intruded" into the Pharisee's house apparently had one thing on her mind. She wanted to stand beside her king.
The Timing
Could not the woman have chosen a more appropriate opportunity to express the overflow of her soul? Perhaps. But the fact of the matter is, she did not know that she would have any other opportunity, appropriate or not. Jesus' whereabouts were unpredictable. He was here one moment, gone the next. In a village one day, preaching from a fishing boat the next. Sometimes he moved openly among the people, at other times he moved in the shadows. How was she to know when or where she would catch up to him again? So, she took advantage of the opportunity when it presented itself at the home of Simon the Pharisee. Not an ideal, private, calculated opportunity, but an opportunity. Catch as catch can.
The Right Time
Wallace D. Chappell tells that following one of his sermons a little girl came to the front of the church to meet him. He was the guest evangelist in the church for the week, so he did not know her nor her older sister who stood close by. The older sister was encouraging her to relate something to Chappell, the nature of which was not immediately clear. Finally, after considerable coaxing, the little girl told that on the day before she had received a telephone call from a lady who was visiting in the city from out of state. The lady had dialed the wrong number. Although the little girl did not know who the lady was, she began to talk to her. Reaching to make conversation, as children often do, the girl remembered that there would be preaching at her church that evening so she passed along that bit of information and invited the lady to attend. The little girl, warming to her story as she told it, said, "The lady said she hadn't been inside a church in 20 years." Then, with excitement in her voice, the child said, "She was at churchtonight. I talked to her. And when you asked for people to accept Jesus, she was one of those who came forward."
The lady was from out of state. She was in that particular city for a particular purpose and had her own agenda. To go into a strange church and hear a visiting evangelist preach was not a big item on her list of things to do. It was not a good time. But something about the little girl's invitation led her to take advantage of the opportunity. Probably a dozen reasons why she could not go raced through her mind: the circumstances were not right, she didn't have time; you can imagine the other reasons. At some point, however, it came to her that although things were not as she would have arranged them, it was an opportunity and she would seize it.
When you are waiting on the "right time" to come to Christ or if you are delaying your commitment until circumstances are "right," remember the woman in Luke's story who was so full of joy and gratitude that she would take advantage of any opportunity to praise God for what he had done for her through Christ Jesus her Lord! Those who are resolved will 'catch as catch can.' Those who have no resolve will never catch up to just the right opportunity. It will always be the wrong time.
The Attention
The gracious attention bestowed upon Jesus by the woman appears even greater when we take into account that the Pharisee-host had been remiss in extending the basic courtesies. William Barclay was told in one of his commentaries that when a guest entered the house in Bible times, three things were always done: the host gave the guest the kiss of peace; cool water was poured over the guest's feet; and either a pinch of incense was burned or a drop of ointment (or fragrance) was placed upon the head of the guest. These were not exceptional considerations, but common courtesies.
The Pharisee mumbles against the woman for what she had done and insinuates that Jesus is wasting his time and emotion on someone so undeserving. Jesus overheard his comments, which included the assertion that Jesus was not a prophet or else he would have known what kind of woman was fawning over him. Jesus then proceeds to point out what Simon, the host, had not done, but first he related a brief story:
"Simon, I have something to say to you. And he answered, 'What is it Teacher?' 'A certain creditor had two debtors; one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. When they could not pay, he forgave them both. Now which of them will love him more?' Simon answered, 'The one, I suppose, to whom he forgave more.' And he said to him, 'You have judged rightly' (Luke7:40-43)."
Having set up the lesson in the same manner which Nathan used with David, Jesus now catches Simon flat-footed:
"Then turning toward the woman he said to Simon, 'Do you see this woman? I entered your house, you gave me no water for my feet, but she has wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in she has not ceased to kiss my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment. Therefore I tell you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little.' And he said to her, 'Your sins are forgiven' (Luke 7:44-48)."
If Simon had not been suspect in the beginning, he is now. Why had he invited Jesus into his home in the first place? There is the outside chance that he was a reluctant admirer, similar to Nicodemus, but his total lack of courtesy causes us to doubt that. Probably, he had invited Jesus out of sheer curiosity. Should Jesus be so novel as to be entertaining, or should he disclose some information which could be used against him - all the better.
Jesus appears not to have been offended nearly so much by Simon's lack of courtesy as by his inability to comprehend the whole matter of forgiveness. He saw no need for forgiveness in his own life, for he had done nothing wrong. He saw no chance for forgiveness for the woman because she had done nothing right.
You and I are somewhere between Simon and the woman, inclined toward one extreme or the other. We either perceive Christ as something of a curiosity, showing him little or no serious regard, or we perceive him as Lord of our lives, someone to honor at every opportunity (no opportunity wasted) because we have been forgiven much!
The Pharisee and the woman show us both ends of the spectrum. Both were expressing their faith; that is to say, both were behaving in a manner indicative of their faith, indicative of their consciousness of being forgiven. We are there, at some point on the spectrum, enthusiastically expressing our faith, or blandly not expressing our faith, in response to forgiveness for our sins. If we have personally experienced forgiveness for our sins, then like the woman, we cannot praise God enough. If we have not had the experience, then like the Pharisee, we stand in the presence of praise and ask, "What is going on?"
Expression Of Faith
Faith, or more precisely, the expression of faith, is the primary focus of our text. Forgiveness is brought into the picture, but only to explain why the woman was expressing herself with such abandon. Jesus did not say "forgiveness has saved you," but rather, "Your faith has saved you." So the question is not, "Did she have faith?" She did. The question is not "What is faith?" That question is as broad as it is long. The letter to the Hebrews explains that faith means we areconfident of what we hope for and convinced of what we do not see. John Dewey, seeking to be helpful, said, "Faith is the tendency toward action, the matrix of all formulated creed and the inspiration of endeavor." Walter Rathenau said, "Faith creates the mood in which events are determined." Do you begin to see why we do not wish to pursue a definition of faith. To do so would only tangle us up in our own feet. And clearly, the question is not, "Are there degrees of faith?" We yield our curiosity about this question to those folk who are inclined to ponder such things as "how many angels can dance on the point of a needle?" Jesus commended the woman for her faith. Rather than beat it to death, just sit back and enjoy seeing what it produced:
A Generous Attitude
If the woman had done only what she could afford to do, this story would not be in the Bible. She did not have the kind of income to allow her to be so lavish in her expressions. She did not have the kind of reputation that could modify a bizarre action. She had long since surrendered her reputation. Could she "afford" to do something now which would suggest that she had surrendered her sanity, too? Hardly. She could not "afford" another embarrassment any more than she could afford to "waste" a flask of precious ointment. Obviously, her faith delivered her at the speed of light beyond such selfish questions as, "How long could this ointment last me if I am careful with it," and "How much money could I get for this alabaster flask and ointment if I sold them?" Had she responded to Christ by doing what she could "afford" to do, we would never have heard of this woman!
To know and experience Christ is to want to love and honor Christ with the best that we have. Love does not count the costs or consider the limits. It just pours and pours itself out upon the beloved. How many sweethearts in love do you know who keep an itemized list of expenses of what they have spent on each other? How many parents do you know who maintain a financial record against expenses involved in rearing their children, and then when the child becomes an adult, a reimbursement is demanded? For that matter, how many parents do you know who only do for their child what they can afford to do? Love does not bother to add up the column, because it doesn't bother to enter anything in the column. When we think of it in this way, and then think of the woman anointing Jesus, we begin to understand what Paul meant when he wrote, "Love never ends." I would not be surprised if the woman was not disapointed because she had only one flask of ointment to pour out. She probably would have emptied an entire vase if it had been available! Just be assured that the thought of what she could "afford" never entered her mind. Love is generous. Knowing this, I make it a point never to preach about money or how much a Christian ought to give as an expression of faith. If a person truly loves Christ, their expression of faith will reflect it.
Jesus commended the woman for her faith. Her generous attitude was a product of that faith.
A Worshipful Attitude
By anointing Jesus, the woman was actually making a praise offering. It was in her heart to praise, honor, and adore the one who had transformed her life, and one of the wonderful things about praise, honor, and adoration is that all three are directed beyond oneself. The worshipful attitude focuses upon something higher than personal regard, taking no thought of any advantage which might be gained. That is to say, worshiping God in order to gain any possible spiritual leverage, "Doing this for God in order to make it easier for God to do this for me." That is a sorry motivation, isn't it? Such an attitude is not produced by faith, but by a selfish, mercenary mind. Praise and adoration issue freely from a mind that is saturated with the desire to give. Worship involves acts of praise; something that a selfish mind is incapable of rendering. The adoring mind cannot render enough. There is no need to ask, "Of which mind was the woman?" There is the need to ask, "Of what mind are we?" remembering that faith produces a worshipful attitude.
Confident Attitude
We should not miss the attitude in which the woman entered the Pharisee's home. Although uninvited, she made no apology. Kneeling at the feet of Jesus, she made no explanation. For her reputation, she made no excuses. Filled with emotion, she made no pretense. As a matter of fact, there is no record that she ever said anything. Confident in faith, and taking no notice of anyone or anything except the one she had come to praise, she proceeded.
Faith produces confidence. Someone has told about a woman who became a Christian late in life. The deep lines in her face and dark places beneath her eyes reflected the kind of life she had lived. But, like the thief on the cross and the laborers who came late to the vineyard, she couldn't turn the clock back and start at the beginning, so she would do the next best thing: come to Christ and start from there. It was not easy. Her old friends ridiculed her and complained that her new lifestyle made them uncomfortable. Finally, one of them hatefully snapped at her; "Who do you think you are anyway, so high and mighty all of a sudden? You're nothing but an ugly old woman!" To which the woman (like the woman of our text) made no apology, explanation, excuse, nor pretense. She only smiled confidently and replied, "Yes, but isn't it wonderful that God can love an ugly, old woman like me?"
There is no substitute for the confidence produced by faith.
There was ointment. It was precious. There were tears. They were precious, too. Mingling together on the feet of Jesus, they were the very best that she could give. Truly an "outward" and "inward" expression of faith!
What now about your own expression of faith? If it were to be publicly called into account, would it be more than you could "afford" or more than you could afford to say?