Luke 12:13-21 · The Parable of the Rich Fool
Sharing Shalom
Luke 12:13-21
Sermon
by W. Robert McClelland
Loading...

The Bible has a great deal to say about wealth and the people who own it. This parable of Jesus for example: The usual interpretation speaks of it as a teaching concerning the folly of a life devoted to the accumulation of wealth. It is ridiculous to seek security through riches. The foolishness becomes obvious, so the interpretation goes, when suddenly one night the man dies and must stand before God. Then he sees with tragic clarity the utter folly of it all. It was stupid, if not sinful, to amass riches. Better, therefore, to be spiritually rich and economically poor.

The trouble with this traditional interpretation of the text is that it does not square with our experience. Many of us enjoy working. Some of us find great satisfaction and pleasure in the challenges and rewards of work. We do not find working, and the accumulation of those things which come as a result of our endeavors, to be an evil. Moreover, we have managed a good balance between work and leisure and enjoy the things that money can buy which do, in fact, bring us happiness.

The Old Testament calls this sense of happy well-being, "Shalom." I do not mean to suggest that people on welfare cannot find happiness. It is just that I do not wish to trade the problems of wealth for those of poverty and I know of few who do. Possessions do enhance our lives. Our experience leads us to conclude that money has the ability to bring blessings to ourselves and others. It has, in short, the power to convey God's Shalom.

Because our experience does not square with the traditional understanding of Jesus' parable, we fail to take it seriously. We manage to feel guilty, of course, because most of us are affluent by this world's standards and assume the bony finger of accusation is pointed at us by Jesus, but we do not really believe that riches are evil or the satisfaction that we derive from our work is blasphemous. Consequently, when we give money to the church or charitable causes we do so dutifully, perhaps grudgingly; out of a sense of obligation and guilt.

Our failure to take the parable seriously, however, may not be an indication of stubborn sinfulness as much as an indication, born of our experience, that the conventional interpretation misses the point.

The most memorable line in the story is the oft decried admonition to "Eat, drink, and be merry," for tomorrow you may die. The underlying assumption among believers is that there is something wrong - cynical, if not sinful - about eating, drinking, and being merry in the face of death's certainty.

Such a conclusion flies in the face of the religious tradition out of which Jesus came, however. His spirituality was one which emphasized celebration and feasting. Clearly Jesus enjoyed a good party. While attending the wedding reception at Cana, he saw to it that there was plenty of good wine for everyone - 180 gallons by John's count! That must have been some party!

Later, he was carried away when feeding the multitudes by the sea and, after everyone had eaten their fill, there was enough food left over to fill 12 baskets with doggie bags.

Many of Jesus' parables about the kingdom of God draw on his own experience at dinner parties for their point. And let it never be forgotten that his critics found sufficient justification in his lifestyle to accuse him of being a "glutton and a drunkard (Luke 7:34)." Jesus was clearly a person who enjoyed eating, drinking and being merry.

The story, therefore, deserves another look.

On closer examination we discover that Jesus did not condemn the man for eating, drinking and being merry, nor even for being rich. Rather the man was called foolish for building bigger barns. The point of the story is that the entrepreneur was planning to store more of his wealth than he needed to eat, drink and be merry. Look again at the words of the story. The man says, "What shall I do for I have nowhere to store my crops?" Not true! He has barns. His problem is that his harvest has been so great that his present storage facilities will not hold all of the grain. So he decides, "I will tear down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain. Then and only then will I have ample goods to eat, drink and be merry." Again, not true! He already has ample goods. He does not have to live in the moment. He has barns for his future. They may not be as big as he would like, but he has plenty to eat, drink and be merry. The man already has enough wealth to enjoy Shalom. He has a sense of well-being and security because God has generously blessed his land with fruitfulness. Fortune has smiled on him and he has been able to accumulate a sizeable portion of this world's goods.

The point of the story is not that there is something wrong with amassing some wealth, but that he was intending to store it all by building bigger barns and storing it would be lost. He was called "foolish" because he did not recognize that his wealth had brought him happiness and that it could do the same for others if only it were not locked up in those bigger barns. His sin was not that he had become wealthy, but that he wanted to hoard all his wealth. His sin was not that he ate, drank and was merry, but that he was withholding the means for others to do the same. He had become a bottleneck in the flow of Shalom blessings to others.

The story, so understood, is not a teaching condemning the foolishness of gathering wealth. It is rather a parable which condemns the refusal to share the wealth we do not need. It warns about the shortsightedness of failing to be a good custodian of the abundance that God entrusts to us.

Now that is a story with relevance for us as western Christians and one which we need to hear. You and I are, by any world measure of wealth, affluent people. I may not have great wealth, but measured by this world's standards, I have much wealth and it brings me and my family Shalom. It enables me to eat, drink and be merry most of the time. It certainly conveys a sense of well-being that poverty doesn't. Nothing brings Shalom like a roof over your head and three square meals a day. Yet, we can eat only so much. Our closets can hold only so many clothes. We can live in only one place at a time. It is possible to draw the line at some point and say, "We have enough."

Nevertheless, our society has moved beyond the production of basic human needs to become a "consumer society" whose vitality and growth is maintained by convincing us that we need everything: a second car, an electric toothbrush, a new boat, a vacation home, a closet full of new clothes every time the fashions change. Government officials take great pride in pointing to an expanding economy, but it expands only by selling us goods and services that we do not need. We are a nation of bigger barn builders. We comprise only six percent of the world's population but consume forty percent of its goods. Collectively, we, too, are a bottleneck in the flow of Shalom to the rest of the world.

Jesus' parable, therefore, does have relevance. It raises the question, "How am I to regard my wealth, and what am I to do with it?" Sensitized to the plight of the world's oppressed peoples who are my brothers and sisters in Christ, I must now make a choice. I can either feel guilty about being wealthy and dispose of my goods as a danger to my spiritual health, or I can regard my wealth as a blessing showered for me for no more reason than the rain that falls on the just and the unjust; yet nevertheless to be used in the service of the Holy One.

To see my possessions as blessings from God is to realize that I have them on loan. I do not own them. A blessing is not something I earn, something for which I can take credit as if it was part of the cause and effect scheme of things. We have no ultimate claim on our blessings; otherwise they lose their blessed-ness. That I have them at all is a gift of grace which defies rational explanation. Why some are blessed with health and happiness, not to mention wealth, and others are not is a question which both puzzled and bothered the psalmists of old. It is an eternal mystery and a contemporary quandry. But that they have been entrusted to me is a fact I cannot escape. That they be put at God's disposal, therefore; is required.

The Bible lays before us a radical concept of stewardship because it claims any hungry person has as much right to the bread in my freezer as I do; the shirt hanging unused in my closet belongs to anyone who needs it. The money that I plan to bank must be held in joint ownership with the poor. To say that my wealth is a blessing that brings Shalom, is to say in the strongest possible way: everybody and anybody in need has as much claim to it as I do. I do wrong to everyone I could assist but fail to help.

Our role as custodians to whom much has been given and of whom much is required is clarified if we make three affirmations about the much.

1. The much is from God. Wealth, as we have said, is a blessing from God and can bring Shalom into our lives. It is not sinful.

2. The much is sacramental. Wealth as a blessing is to be seen as a sacramental sign of God's love and trustworthiness. Its significance lies in directing our attention beyond itself to the Giver who stands behind the gift.

Annie Dillard tells a childhood story of occasionally hiding a precious penny of her own for someone to find, just for the excitement of it.3 She recounts how she would draw big arrows on the sidewalk leading to it and label them, "Money ahead," or "This way to a surprise." Then she would watch from her hiding place, waiting for somebody - regardless of merit - to find her free gift of grace. She observes that the world is fairly strewn with lucky pennies flung broadside by some generous hand in the universe.

What a grace-full way to regard pennies and dollars! Lucky pennies are sacramental reminders of God's smiling presence. As sacramental signs, our dollars do not point to themselves as something to be held tightly, but rather beyond themselves to the trustworthy God who has strewn them in our path and hides in the shadows enjoying the Shalom they bring us. To confuse the sacramental sign with the thing signified is what the Bible means by idolatry. Hence, to clutch our dollars as if they were ends in themselves rather than seeing the hand that has cast them broadside in our pathway, is to become an idolater. Therein lies the danger of wealth about which the Bible is so concerned. But the danger does not diminish the sacramental function of wealth which is to remind us of the One who hides along our pathway. When we understand money sacramentally we can see that we are directed by our very wealth to trust in the God who feeds the birds of the air and provides fantastic fashions for the flowers of the field. God's provideence is secure; currency is not. It can be devalued, lost or stolen.

3. The much is to be shared. Wealth brings Shalom into our lives and, consequently, is to be shared with others because it has the power to bring Shalom into their lives as well. The right to private property is not an absolute. From a biblical perspective there is no such thing as private property because, as the Psalmist says, "The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof (Psalm 24:1)." The world's treasures, therefore, are God's and we are merely stewards of them for a time.

Returning then to the parable of the prosperous farmer who had to make a decision about building bigger barns to hold his surplus harvest, the story would have a different ending if the man had recognized he had enough and shared his surplus with others. He might even have been spoken of by Jesus as "rich toward God." But as it stands, the story addresses us as affluent western Christians.

Let us hype the point of it by supposing that we are millionaries. Now that is a consummation devoutly to be wished, but probably not a present prospect. Nevertheless, it is a fantasy worth entertaining for a moment.

If you had a million dollars what would you do with it? Specifically, how would you change the world? I find that an intriguing question. It is, in fact, the question of Shalom stewardship because a million dollars is more money than most of us need to eat, drink and be merry. The fact that we are now able to live on our present incomes would seem to suggest that we do not need much more. Some, perhaps, but for the most part we have enough. We are able to make do; able to eat, drink and be merry. Everything between our present income and a million dollars is surplus wealth. Consequently, if our dream came true and we inherited a million dollars from a rich uncle, we would suddenly find ourselves standing in the shoes of the rich man about whom Jesus was speaking. We would have more than ample goods and, like him, would be faced with the question of what to do with them. What are we to do with our over-abundance? Do we build bigger barns to store our wealth even though we do not need it? Or do we try to change the world a little because we believe in the power of wealth? Do we share the surplus with others - thereby, enabling them to eat, drink and be merry - or do we put it in the bank?

What about a half a million dollars? Or even a quarter of a million? Would there be any surplus money after expenses for eating, drinking and making merry?

Of course your present income may not be adequate for your present or anticipated financial needs. You may have children to put through not only college, but graduate school. Or aging parents to care for. But at some theoretical point on a monetary continuum it is possible to draw a line and say, "Enough! I can live with this amount and meet my responsibilities and fulfill my financial obligations." Everything beyond that figure, whether it be a million dollars, a half million, a hundred thousand, or a mere fifty thousand, everything beyond that point is surplus and can be given away without jeopardizing your own Shalom.

The relevant points for us to glean from Luke's story, therefore, seem to be at least the following:

1 - Like the rich farmer, who had much, all that we have is to be received gratefully as a blessing from God.

2 - Nevertheless, there is some level of wealth which is ample for us to eat, drink and be merry, just as there was for him.

3 - Unlike the rich man, however, we understand ourselves as stewards entrusted with our wealth for a time. We are not merely to store it away but to put it to good use by sharing our surplus with others in direct proportion to the abundance of our blessing, as the Spirit of God indicates.

Jesus' parable invites us to boldly examine our financial resources and declare at what level we have enough. We do not have to squirrel more and more of our wealth away in bigger and better barns or savings accounts. There is some level at which each of us can say after cold sober reflection, "I have ample goods. Thank you, God!" Beyond that level Jesus invites us to consider sharing everything else with others. In the last analysis the measure of our faith is not how loudly we sing in church or how well we know the Bible. The measure of our trust in God is how tightly we grasp our billfolds.

C.S.S Publishing Co., FIRE IN THE HOLE, by W. Robert McClelland