The narrative portion of John’s Gospel begins by referring yet a third time to the message of John the Baptist (cf. vv. 6–8, 15–16). The difference between this section and the references in the prologue is that attention now focuses on a particular testimony of John the Baptist given on a particular occasion when the Jewish authorities, later designated more precisely as Pharisees (v. 24), sent a delegation of priests and Levites from Jerusalem to question him. This occasion stretches out to at least a week. By the use of the phrase, the next day (vv. 29, 35, 43), and “on the third day” (2:1), the writer presents a six-day sequence followed by an indefinite “few days” (2:12). The purpose is to highlight a memorable period at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry. Day One consists of John the Baptist’s negative testimony: He tells what he himself is not (vv. 19–28). Day Two consists of John’s positive testimony: He proclaims Jesus and tells the people who Jesus is (vv. 29–34). The rest of the week consists of stories of how people came to faith, directly or indirectly as a result of John’s testimony (1:35–2:11). C. H. Dodd has noticed how 1:6–8 serves as an appropriate outline for what follows: John was not the light (1:19–28) but came to testify about the light (1:29–34), so that through him everyone might believe (1:35–37; cf. 10:42). (Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963], pp. 248–49.)
The questioning of John the Baptist on the first day recalls the popular response to his ministry according to Luke’s Gospel: “The people were waiting expectantly and were all wondering in their hearts if John might possibly be the Christ” (Luke 3:15). The difference in John’s Gospel is a tone of implied hostility, rather than hopefulness. Both Luke and John presuppose considerable prior activity by John the Baptist. He must have attracted considerable attention in order to prompt such questions as Who are you? Are you Elijah? Are you the Prophet? It appears that the reader is being introduced to him rather well along in his ministry, perhaps even toward its end. According to the book of Acts, it is “as John was completing his work, he said: ‘Who do you think I am? I am not that one. No, but he is coming after me’ ” (Acts 13:25).
The Baptizer knows what his questioners have in mind. They have not mentioned the Messiah explicitly, but he states without hesitation, I am not the Christ. The Christ [Messiah], or anointed one, was viewed in several ways by the Jews of Jesus’ time. Most often he was expected as a mighty king from the line of David (cf. “King of Israel,” v. 49), but sometimes he was pictured as a great priest like Aaron or Melchizedek or a great teacher or prophet like Moses. When the messengers from Jerusalem ask Are you Elijah? and Are you the Prophet? they are still pressing the question of messiahship. John the Baptist’s I am not or no to each of these titles sounds like a simple denial, but the Gospel writer insists that “he confessed, he did not deny, but confessed” (v. 20, RSV) when he said I am not the Christ. John the Baptist’s disclaimer is actually a confession because of its implication to the reader that what John is not, Jesus is. Clearly, Jesus is the Messiah (cf. 1:41; 20:31), but he is also Elijah, and he is the Prophet. These are not titles John the Baptist will use in formulating his own positive testimony to Jesus (vv. 29, 34), but they are applicable nonetheless. The narrator has an interest throughout this chapter in collecting titles by which Jesus can be named and known. All are legitimate and appropriate, and some will prove more important than others, but in the Gospel as a whole the reality of who Jesus is will exceed any one title or even a collection of every possible title.
The prophecy of Malachi ends with God’s promise that “I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes. He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse” (Mal. 4:5–6). Christian tradition has regarded Elijah as a forerunner of the Messiah, but here he is seen as the forerunner of God himself and therefore a messianic figure in his own right. His mission is one of reconciliation, and his message one of repentance, the last chance for repentance before the dreaded “day of the LORD.” This understanding of Elijah is apparently what lies behind the question addressed to John the Baptist. John’s call to repentance and his baptizing ministry based on people’s response to that call (cf. Mark 1:4–5) certainly raised the question, Who are you? and may well have prompted the conjecture that John was Elijah.
The question Are you the Prophet? also rests on a specific biblical text, in which Moses tells the Israelites that the Lord “will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers. You must listen to him. For this is what you asked of the LORD your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, ‘Let us not hear the voice of the LORD our God nor see this great fire anymore, or we will die.’ The LORD said to me: ‘What they say is good. I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him. If anyone does not listen to my words that the prophet speaks in my name, I myself will call him to account’ ” (Deut. 18:15–19). As far as this Gospel is concerned, the Prophet is Jesus just as surely as the Messiah is Jesus (cf. 6:15). Jesus is “the one Moses wrote about in the Law” (1:45; cf. 5:46), and even when he is designated in other ways (e.g., as the Son), the repeated insistence in this Gospel is that he speaks only the words that the Father has given him. He is the Revealer, and thus the Prophet par excellence (cf. once more Heb. 1:1–2).
On the other hand, Jesus is nowhere in the New Testament explicitly identified as Elijah or said to fulfill Elijah’s messianic role. Though analogies exist between Jesus’ ministry and that of the historical Elijah (e.g., Luke 4:25–26; 7:11–17), and though some saw Jesus in this way (Mark 6:15; 8:28), Jesus himself is said to have reinterpreted Elijah’s role in prophecy as preliminary rather than final and assigned that role to none other than John the Baptist! (e.g., Matt. 11:14; 17:10–13). But this was something new. John the Baptist himself still saw Elijah as a messianic figure and so shrank from identification with him. Implicit in his denial is the assumption that the One coming after him is Elijah, as well as the Prophet and the Messiah. This may account, as Raymond Brown suggests (The Gospel According to John, AB 29A [New York: Doubleday, 1966], p. 64) for John’s remarkable pronouncement that the Coming One was before me (v. 30). Elijah, like the Messiah and the Prophet, turns out by implication to be Jesus, but there the Gospel writer lets it rest. The term “Messiah” will emphasize Jesus’ kingship, and “Prophet” will call attention to the revelation that he brings; but an identification of Jesus as “Elijah” would only have complicated the picture without adding a useful dimension of its own. So the Gospel writer allows it to remain a merely negative and indirect testimony to Jesus Christ.
When the delegation from Jerusalem kept pressing the question of John’s identity, he claimed (in the words of Isaiah) to be only the voice of one calling in the desert, “Make straight the way for the Lord!” (v. 23; cf. Isa. 40:3). From the narrator’s standpoint this meant that John the Baptist would prepare the way for Jesus (cf. 3:28), but from the standpoint of John’s questioners, it was merely another evasion. If he is not a messianic figure, they asked, why does he baptize? (v. 25). John’s baptizing ministry had attracted the authorities’ attention, but it is not clear why they thought the practice had messianic implications. There is no evidence in ancient sources that baptism was considered part of the Messiah’s (or the Prophet’s) work. What concerned the messengers, therefore, was probably not the baptizing activity as such but the call to repentance that they knew it signified. How could a man who claimed for himself no messianic role summon the Jews of his day to such a decisive turning?
Yet even though the Gospel writer presupposes earlier traditions about John the Baptist’s repentance preaching (cf. Mark 1:4, 15; Matt. 3:2, 7–10; Luke 3:2–3, 7–14), his own interest centers on the act of baptism itself. When asked Why do you baptize? John never mentions repentance in his answer. For the moment, in fact, he does not answer the question at all but defers the answer until Day Two. John the Baptist’s crucial pronouncement is actually begun on one day and completed on the next. Someone familiar with the earlier traditions would expect him to say, “I baptize in water, but the One coming after me will baptize in the Holy Spirit” (cf. Mark 1:8). Instead, he pauses to emphasize the greatness of the Coming One (v. 27) and postpones the mention of Spirit baptism until Day Two (v. 33), after the Coming One has been identified. And even the completed pronouncement about water and Spirit leaves unanswered the question of why John baptizes. That too is left for Day Two. It is sufficient for the moment to make two points: first, that the identity of the Coming One is still unknown, but second, that he is incomparably greater than John himself.
The account of Day Two begins with John the Baptist’s explicit identification of the Coming One as Jesus (vv. 29–30), an identification only hinted at in the other Gospels (e.g., Matt. 11:3/Luke 7:20; Matt. 3:14). John here carries out the role assigned to him in the prologue. He speaks for the entire Christian community in confessing Jesus to be both Lamb of God (v. 29) and Son of God (v. 34). Only now does he answer the question, “Why do you baptize?” His baptism is for the sake of Jesus, “that he might be revealed to Israel” (v. 31). The Israel to whom Jesus is revealed is not the whole nation but a small circle of disciples, a group of “real Israelites” (cf. 1:47) who become the nucleus of a new community and to whom Jesus is later said to have “revealed his glory” (2:11) at Cana in Galilee.
Jesus is first identified as the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (v. 29). The apparent reference to his sacrificial death comes unexpectedly at this point and (except for v. 36) has no known parallel in John the Baptist’s teaching. Yet even in the Synoptics, John’s baptism is said to be “for the forgiveness of sins” (Mark 1:4; Luke 3:3). The Coming One that he proclaims “will clear his threshing floor, gathering the wheat into his barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire” (Matt. 3:12; cf. Luke 3:17). God’s world is to be purified; all sin will be purged from the earth, and everything evil will be destroyed. Lamb of God by itself suggests a quite different image, the blood sacrifice of an innocent victim, but the point of the saying is not so much that the Lamb bears the guilt of the world’s sin as that the Lamb quite literally takes sin away. The focus is on the result of the Lamb’s work, not on the means of reaching that result.
The best commentary on this message is 1 John 3:5, in which the language of John the Baptist lives on: “You know that he appeared so that he might take away our sins. And in him is no sin.” “Appeared” is the same verb translated in the present passage as “revealed” or “made known,” and though the title Lamb is missing in First John, the mention of Jesus’ sinlessness recalls the sacrificial lamb “without defect” prescribed in Old Testament law (e.g., Exod. 12:5; Lev. 22:18–25; cf. 1 Pet. 1:19–20). “Taking away sins” is then equated, in a parallel formation in the context, with destroying the devil’s works: “The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work” (1 John 3:8). This, according to John’s Gospel, is exactly what Jesus’ death accomplished: “Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out” (John 12:31; cf. 16:8–11). John the Baptist’s message involves both salvation and judgment. Though he sees Jesus as a lamb, the work of this lamb is as many-sided as that of the messianic Lamb in the book of Revelation (e.g., Rev. 5:6–14). He is not simply a victim, but the world’s Savior (cf. John 4:42) and its Judge. The future of the world, and of everyone in it, is in his hands.
John the Baptist immediately explains that it was indeed Jesus, the Lamb of God, that he was announcing earlier when he spoke somewhat indefinitely about the Coming One. At that time he did not know who the Coming One would be (v. 31), but now he does. Before the identity of the Coming One could be “revealed to Israel,” it had to be revealed to John himself, and John proceeds to tell how that revelation came about. God gave him a signal: When he saw the Spirit come down from the sky and rest on a certain person, he would know that that person was the Coming One, who (just as John had promised) would baptize in the Holy Spirit (v. 33). At some point (presumably the baptism of Jesus), John the Baptist saw exactly that. The Spirit came down as a dove out of the sky and rested on Jesus, signifying to John that Jesus was the Son of God (vv. 32, 34). John the Baptist here becomes a participant in the supernatural events attending Jesus’ baptism. The voice from heaven (“You are my Son, whom I love” Mark 1:11) goes unmentioned, but its place is taken by Son of God in John’s testimony.
The baptism of Jesus is recounted only indirectly and in retrospect. It is not really part of the narrator’s six-day sequence. Already on the first day, John the Baptist had told the delegation from Jerusalem that among you stands one you do not know (1:26). The implication is that by this time John himself does know him, for he adds whose sandals I am not worthy to untie (1:27). The events recalled in verses 32–34 are already in the past, and Jesus is in Bethany (among you, 1:26), probably in the company of John’s followers. Therefore, when John sees Jesus coming toward him (v. 29) it is not for baptism but is simply the narrator’s way of bringing Jesus dramatically on the scene. There is no way to be sure how long before the six days Jesus’ baptism is supposed to have taken place or how long Jesus’ association with John is thought to have lasted. The references to the Spirit not only “coming down” on Jesus but “remaining” on him (vv. 32, 33) suggest that John the Baptist may have had weeks or even months to get to know Jesus as a man full of the Spirit (cf. 1:16; 3:34) before publicly revealing him to Israel. Whether this means that Jesus was himself one of John’s disciples is a question of interest to historians, but apparently not to the Gospel writer. Looking back on the association two chapters later, John’s disciples refer to Jesus vaguely as “that man who was with you on the other side of the Jordan” (3:26), and the author is content to leave the matter there.
Additional Notes
1:23 John replied in the words of … Only in this Gospel does the quotation of Isa. 40:3 appear on the lips of John the Baptist himself. In the other Gospels it is part of the comment of the Gospel writer (Mark 1:3; Luke 3:4; Matt. 3:3). In Matthew, however, it is closely joined to John’s own words and may have been adapted from them with only slight changes (“This is [rather than “I am”] he who was spoken of through the prophet Isaiah”). If Isa. 40:3 helped shape the consciousness of the Essene community of Qumran in going out to the Judean desert to study the law (1QS 8.13–16), there is no reason why it could not have influenced John the Baptist as well.
1:24 Some Pharisees who had been sent: It is highly unlikely that the writer would either introduce a new delegation at this point or belatedly add Pharisees to “priests and Levites” (v. 19) in the same delegation! It would be preferable to translate this phrase as RSV: “Now they had been sent from the Pharisees.” This reiterates v. 19 and thus (by appearing to make a fresh start) sets off the last and most crucial question (Why do you baptize?) from the series of preliminary questions that led up to it.
1:25 If you are not … Elijah: The only hint of a Jewish belief that Elijah was expected to baptize comes from a Christian document a half century later than the Gospel of John. Justin Martyr, in his Dialogue with Trypho 8.4, represents Trypho the Jew as claiming that the Messiah is unknown “until Elijah comes to anoint him and make him manifest to all” (see ANF 1.199). It should be noted, first, that even here the word baptize is not used, and second, that in other respects the passage appears to have been shaped by the Gospel’s account of what John the Baptist actually did for Jesus (cf. John 1:31). It therefore testifies more faithfully to Christian than to Jewish traditions.
1:28 At Bethany on the other side of the Jordan: The place is otherwise unknown. It was a mystery even to Origen in the third century, who adopted instead the reading “Bethabara” (Commentary on John 6.40), a town east of the Jordan mentioned in other ancient sources. Pierson Parker (“ ‘Bethany beyond Jordan,’ ” JBL 74 [1955], p. 258) identified this Bethany with the Bethany just outside Jerusalem by translating the location as “across from where John had baptized in Jordan.” But elsewhere in John’s Gospel (i.e., 3:26; 10:40) the phrase “on the other side of the Jordan” clearly refers to the east bank (i.e., the present kingdom of Jordan), and there is no reason to understand it differently here. It is in any case unlikely that the writer would identify the well-known Bethany of Martha, Mary, and Lazarus in such a strange manner (contrast 11:1, 18). So the location of this other Bethany east of the Jordan remains undetermined.
Two features of the narrative deserve mention: (1) Aside from the quotation of Isa. 40:3, no particular emphasis is placed on John’s ministry being “in the desert.” Bethany to the east of the Jordan is presumably a village, like “Aenon near Salim” on the Judean side (cf. 3:23). The ensuing narrative suggests that Jesus had a place to live there (1:39), and that fig trees grew in the vicinity (1:48). (2) The text does not say in so many words that John the Baptist was baptizing in the Jordan River. Though the synoptic Gospels make it clear that he did baptize in the Jordan (Mark 1:5; Matt. 3:6), John’s Gospel indicates greater mobility on his part. He baptized at Aenon “because there was plenty of water” there (i.e., probably natural springs and pools), and the same may have been true at Bethany.
1:29 Lamb of God: C. H. Dodd (The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel [Cambridge: University Press, 1958], pp. 230–38) argued for a Jewish background to the title from apocalyptic references to the Messiah as a powerful young ram who defends the flock of God against its adversaries and puts them to flight. This is an appealing suggestion and one that may well be correct, but the evidence is meager (only Enoch 90.38 and Testament of Joseph 19.8, the latter of which may actually be a Christian interpretation of John 1:29 rather than the source of it). As Dodd himself seemed to recognize (pp. 236–38), the more significant evidence is the Lamb in the book of Revelation, together with 1 John 3:5 and the undeniable fact that making an end of sin was one of the functions of the Jewish Messiah.
Other suggestions (for example, that Lamb of God recalls the Passover Lamb, or the Servant described in Isaiah 53, or Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac in Genesis 22) fall short, first, because they weaken the credibility of this verse as a pronouncement of John the Baptist in particular, and second, because even for the Gospel writer these themes are peripheral rather than central to the understanding of Jesus’ redemptive death (though see 8:56; 19:14, 36).
1:30 A man who comes after me. It is necessary to keep in mind the time frame of this verse. The announcement that a man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me was made earlier than the events described in this Gospel, earlier even than Jesus’ baptism. Back at that time, John says, I myself did not know him (v. 31). John was still speaking of an indefinite Coming One, not of Jesus in particular, for he had not yet seen the sign of the dove that identified the Coming One as Jesus. Therefore, when he says, a man who comes after me, he must be referring to real temporal succession (“a man will come along later”) and not, as some have suggested, to discipleship (“a man now following me as my disciple has taken precedence over me”). To “come after” can indeed be an expression for discipleship (cf. Mark 8:34), but John’s statement here cannot be used as proof that Jesus was John’s disciple.
The same is probably true of 1:27, even though this verse is spoken at a later time when John the Baptist knows that the Coming One is now present (v. 26). The statement that “he is the one who comes after me” (v. 27) is probably another reference back to the same earlier saying quoted in v. 30, not an intimation that Jesus is John’s disciple. This saying is quoted only in retrospect in the Gospel (1:15, 30), and the brief allusion to it in 1:27 appears to be no exception.
1:34 Son of God: Some important ancient manuscripts read, instead, “the Chosen One (Gr.: eklektos) of God.” A strong case can be made for this variant. It is easy to see how a copyist might have changed “Chosen One of God” to the better-known Son of God, and difficult to imagine a change in the opposite direction. Also the titles given to Jesus in this chapter are, as a rule, not duplicated, and Son of God does appear later in 1:49. Yet the manuscript evidence for Son of God is very strong. That the copyists of the most ancient manuscripts were quite willing to let an unusual or unfamiliar title for Christ stand if they judged it authentic is shown by the well-attested “God the Only One” in v. 18 and “Holy One of God” in 6:69. Here Son of God is probably what the author wrote, but “Chosen One of God” was also clearly remembered and firmly fixed in some of the earliest traditions about John the Baptist (whether written or oral), so that it persisted in the manuscript tradition. Son possibly represents the Gospel writer’s interpretation of John the Baptist’s own term “Chosen One” (cf., e.g., the use of “Son of God” in connection with a reference to Jesus’ baptism in 1 John 5:5).