Exodus 34:29-35 · The Radiant Face of Moses
The Unveiled Truth
Exodus 34:29-35
Sermon
by Robert A. Hausman
Loading...

Moses with horns! Have you ever seen a painting of Moses with horns?

It was a common artistic convention in the middle ages to portray Moses with two horns, one on each side of his head. It all began with this passage. It says that when Moses came down from the mountain, the skin of his face shown. The root of that verb for shining (grn) is the same as the word for horn. Here it seems to be used in the sense of a ray (of the sun) coming forth from the head as a symbol of divinity. The Latin translation, the Vulgate, took it literally and referred to a "horned Moses." From that translation came the pictorial representation of Moses with horns.

Questions of interpretation come not only from the shining face, but also from the veil which Moses put on his face. What kind of a veil was this? The text never describes it. Some have sought a connection between the veil and the masks which priests wear in some religions. We know that they were used, for example, in ancient Egypt. By means of the mask, the priest would assume the "face" of the deity, and thus become the messenger of the deity.

Some have tried to put the horns and veil together and suggest that behind this story somewhere lies a tradition in which Moses was supposed to have worn a horned mask in representing God. Of course, this goes radically against the prohibition in Jewish law against making any images of Yahweh. Thus, if there ever was any reference to a mask in the tradition, it has long since been submerged. So we are left with the veil and the shining face; that will give us enough to chew on!

When Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the two tablets of the covenant, he "did not know that the skin of his face shone because he had been talking with God" (v. 29). What this seems to say is that, because of Moses' unique meeting with God, the skin on his face shone. He was unaware of it, however, although it was clear to everyone else. "When Aaron and all the Israelites saw Moses, the skin of his face was shining, and they were afraid to come near him" (v. 30).

Unlike many people today, the Israelites still thought of God with great awe, and anything connected with God could be terrifying. Moses reassured the people by calling them to himself. Then he "gave them in commandment all that the Lord had spoken with him on Mount Sinai" (v. 32). Since Moses carried the tablets which God himself had inscribed, it would seem as if what Moses gave the people were further words of the covenant given to him by God for the people.

Now we must look at the use of the veil again. Since the people seemed bothered by the glow of Moses' faith, you would think that the point of the veil would be to ease that feeling of the people. That, however, is never clearly stated. Moses is presented as one who regularly communed with God, serving as a mediator between God and the people. Verse 34 suggests regular encounters between Moses and God, apparently when Moses went into the tent of meeting. Whenever Moses had these further meetings, his face would shine again.

The pattern seems to be that when Moses would go in to the Lord, he would take the veil off. The veil would stay off when he would come out again and communicate with the people. Then, finally, when the communication was over, he would put the veil on. In other words, the veil covers his face only in the period when he is not performing his office of receiving and communicating God's word. The text, then, has a certain tension or confusion about the veil. The initial introduction of the veil seems to be in response to the anxiety that the people feel about Moses' shining face. Thus we expect the veil to be used when speaking to the people and to be off when speaking to God. As noted above, this is not the case. Moses seems to wear the veil when he is not functioning as mediator, but then we are not told why or what this might mean.

What we can focus on, first of all, is that the people had a response to the majesty of God reflected in the face of Moses. They were afraid to come near. We have lost much of that awe in the presence of the sacred. We have domesticated God, making God our buddy. We are so concerned about informality, about being on a first name basis with God, that we risk losing a God who really matters. We risk creating God in our image, a God who will never question our priorities, challenge our judgments, or make any demands on us.

But a God who does not have the power to judge also does not have the power to save. We need to let God be God, in full objectivity and power, so that when we really need such a God, that God is there for us. The God who we "chat with" can never leave us speechless. The God who is our buddy cannot be our mighty fortress.

At the same time that we seek to recover the majesty of God, we need to remind ourselves that God does not leave himself without witness. Moses is presented here as the mediator between God and the people. This apparently happened on a regular basis. There is no suggestion in the text that there was a metamorphosis, that Moses became divine, but it is clear by his shining face that he is the bearer of the Word of God.

The enormous gap between the awesome, holy, and jealous God of Sinai and the fearful, sinful, and repentant people of Israel is bridged, from God's side, by the messenger Moses. God condescends to come to us, to put the mighty creative Word into human speech, to enter into the silence of our lives with words of judgment and forgiveness, of promise and hope. The coming of this divine word in human form has its culmination in the incarnation.

"Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but these last days he has spoken to us by a Son" (Hebrews 1:1-2).

The sense of the last days, of the change which comes with the incarnate word, is suggested in the second lesson today (2 Corinthians 3:12--4:2). It picks up the theme of Moses' shining face and veil. The new thing that is added is the idea that the glory of Moses' face was a fading glory (3:7, 13). Since Paul does not have to argue the point, it must have been assumed as a part of the interpretation of the day.

Paul's first point, then, is to argue from the lesser to the greater; i.e., if the splendor of the old dispensation was too great for the Israelites to bear, even though it was fading away, how much greater will be the splendor of the new dispensation (3:7-11).

The second point Paul makes is that we should then act with boldness. Paul seems to suggest that Moses' attempt to hide the passing of the glory by using a veil was an act of timidity (3:12-13). Contrary to Moses, we ought to act with great boldness, since we have the hope of an eternal glory.

The final point Paul makes is that, through the Spirit, we are set free to know the truth and grow in glory. Paul's argument is typically rabbinic. He remembers that when Moses went in to the Lord, the veil was removed (3:16). Now, since the Lord is the Spirit, and the Spirit brings freedom, that means that we who turn to the Lord are free. We have no need for a veil and can be bold in reflecting the splendor of Christ.

And all of us, with unveiled faces, seeing the glory of the Lord as though reflected in a mirror, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another; for this comes from the Lord, the Spirit (3:18).

The spirit gives us the freedom to be transformed into the likeness of Christ, but we need to understand just what sort of glory that is. We do well to consider the gospel of the transfiguration (Luke 9:28-36). Here Moses appears in glory again, accompanied by Elijah. Jesus is also transformed and speaks to them. "They appeared in glory and were speaking of his departure, which he was about to accomplish at Jerusalem" (v. 31).

The word "departure" suggests his death in Jerusalem, his death and resurrection. It is a reminder that we must go through water and wilderness into the promised land. This concept is captured in the icons of the transfiguration created in the Eastern church. The artist has some liberty in portraying the glorified Jesus, but one of the rules is that Jesus must stand squarely with both feet on the mountain. This is in contrast with many of the paintings in the West, where Jesus is hovering in some clouds.

The Spirit ought to give us the boldness to reject that hovering Jesus and stand with the Jesus planted on this earth. We prefer to stay above the world, living frightened and unsatisfying lives; talking poor when we are really quite rich; always envying those with more; unable to risk encounter with those different from us; standing in judgment on those not as good as us; unwilling to change our lifestyles for the future of our grandchildren. But Jesus wants to lead us down the mountain and into the real world: a world divided by fear and hate; a world where the cult of the successful makes many feel worthless; a world where many are passed over, where gay people are ridiculed and people of color oppressed; a world where the gap between rich and poor grows ever greater; a world where women and children are abused; a world where illness can be chronic and disease debilitating; a world where, tragically, parents bury children; a world where many things are not right and cannot now be made right.

Jesus leads us into this world, not to make us suffer, but to set us free. For "the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom" (2 Corinthians 3:17). That freedom is found under the cross. If we lose our life, we will find it. That is the message of Lent which we hear again this Ash Wednesday as we begin our journey with Jesus toward our exodus in Jerusalem.

CSS Publishing Company, THE DAYS ARE SURELY COMING, by Robert A. Hausman