Big Idea: Those who are preoccupied with immediate concerns are in danger of missing what ultimately matters.
Understanding the Text
The latter part of chapter 11 has been dominated by the theme of opposition to Jesus. That theme is now continued, but also it is developed to speak of the opposition that Jesus’s disciples too must expect to meet, and that will challenge them to stand up for God in a hostile environment. A collection of sayings of warning and encouragement spells out the uncomfortable choices that disciples must make. This then raises the issue of the priority of spiritual over material concerns, and the parable of the shortsighted plutocrat then leads into the theme of the tension between God and mammon, which will run through much of the rest of chapter 12 (and will be resumed in chaps. 14 and 16).
Outline/Structure
In 12:1 a large crowd is introduced, but Jesus speaks “first” specifically to his disciples in 12:1–12. Then in 12:13 an interruption from the crowd leads into a more public parable. In 12:22 Jesus will return to addressing disciples, but then he will turn back to the crowd again at 12:54.
Historical and Cultural Background
While Jesus was with them, his disciples faced some criticism, but by and large it was on Jesus himself that the opposition focused. After his death, however, they would face sporadic persecution from both Jewish and pagan sources. Luke himself will provide ample evidence of this in Acts. We know from Josephus (Ant. 20.200) that the Sanhedrin contrived the death of “James the brother of Jesus the so-called Messiah,” while rabbinic sources testify to the exclusion of the minim (heretics) from the synagogues and to the execution of some followers of Jesus (b. Sanh. 43a). Nero’s violent persecution of Christians in Rome in AD 64/65 (Tacitus, Ann. 15.44) apparently was not widespread, but by the early second century it had become a capital offense to be a Christian (Pliny the Younger, Ep. 10.96–97).
Interpretive Insights
12:1 A crowd of many thousands had gathered. Luke’s graphic description reminds us that, despite the opposition, Jesus still has a large following (cf. 9:14). But the disciples are carefully differentiated from the wider crowd, whose loyalties are not yet determined.
the yeast of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. Yeast (which actually refers to leaven, a small portion of dough that contains yeast), because of its pervasive quality, and because it was removed in preparation for the Passover festival, was sometimes (but not always [see 13:20–21]) a symbol for evil influence (cf. 1 Cor. 5:6–8; Gal. 5:9). For “hypocrisy,” see on 6:42; the term has not been used in 11:37–52, but it sums up the distorted religious values exposed there (cf. its repeated use in the parallel passage, Matt. 23:13–36).
12:2–3 There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed. In this context (for a similar saying with a different application, cf. 8:17) these two verses seem to be a warning against thinking that you can get away with pretending to be what you are not. That is the essence of hypocrisy. Our true nature, even if we succeed in hiding it from other people, will eventually be revealed by God’s judgment.
12:4 do not be afraid of those who kill the body. Martyrdom makes sense only if there is a firm conviction of life after death. In that perspective, even physical suffering and death are the lesser evil.
12:5 Fear him who . . . has authority to throw you into hell. That is, of course, God (not the devil, as some have imagined). This is the only time Luke refers to “hell” (geenna, “Gehenna”), which is a more prominent theme in Matthew. The term derives from the Valley of Hinnom, outside the walls of Jerusalem, where the city’s rubbish was burned, and it had become a standard Jewish expression for God’s final destruction of the wicked. To “fear” God is to recognize him as the ultimate authority and judge, and so to put his will first. But that “fear” is carefully balanced here in 12:6–7 by trust in God’s care for his people.
12:6 Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Small birds (“sparrows” is probably too precise) were sold as food for the poor and as pets for the rich. If something so cheap nonetheless matters to God, how much more his people matter! Little birds still die, of course, and so do disciples; but this is not a matter of indifference to God.
12:7 the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Compare 21:18. The disciples’ confidence derives from the fact that God knows everything about them and so also, by implication, about what happens to them.
12:8 whoever publicly acknowledges me before others, the Son of Man will also acknowledge before the angels of God. The verdict in the heavenly court depends on one’s willingness on earth to be known as a disciple of Jesus. The temptation not to acknowledge Jesus, but rather to “disown” him (12:9), would be strong, especially in later times when to be a Christian was in itself a capital offense (see “Historical and Cultural Background” above). But the principle applies also at the lower level of everyday abuse and ostracism met by those who stand up for Jesus. The change from “me” to “the Son of Man” (as in the similar saying in 9:26) has led some to suggest that here (and in 12:10) Jesus is speaking of a “Son of Man” other than himself, but the use of the phrase in the Gospel tradition as a whole makes this highly unlikely. The term “Son of Man” here suitably recalls the imagery of the judgment scene in Daniel 7, from which it is derived.
12:10 anyone who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. There are different versions of this saying in Matthew 12:31–32; Mark 3:28–29. All agree that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit cannot be forgiven, and in Matthew and Mark the reference in context is specifically to the charge (already recorded by Luke in 11:15) that Jesus’s exorcisms are accomplished by demonic power. To attribute the work of God to his enemy is an unforgivable perversion of truth and betrays a settled opposition to God (rather than a single impulsive utterance). But why is it less serious to slander the Son of Man? The point is probably that Jesus, in his “incognito” as the Son of Man, might not immediately be recognized for who he is. The Holy Spirit, by contrast, is the one who works in people’s hearts to call forth a response. To “blaspheme” him is ultimately and finally to reject God’s call and offer of forgiveness.
12:12 the Holy Spirit will teach you . . . what you should say. For a very similar promise, see 21:12–15. This is not an excuse for lazy preachers; it is an assurance that in the intimidating setting of a formal hearing, faithful disciples will not be left to their own devices. This is a very practical outcome of the gift of the Spirit promised in 3:16 (and cf. 11:13).
12:14 who appointed me a judge or an arbiter between you? The man (presumably the younger of two brothers) apparently was looking for a legal ruling or sanction relating to his father’s will, and he thought that this “teacher” (rabbi) would be the ideal person to give it. We are not told whether he had a good case, but in any event, Jesus has a very different understanding of his own role.
12:15 Be on your guard against all kinds of greed. This is not a verdict on the specific case (though the word for “greed” may imply that the man was trying to get the better of his brother), but rather a general comment on human values. Spiritual wealth takes precedence over all earthly possessions.
12:16–20 he told them this parable. It is the story of a successful farmer, and Jesus’s hearers no doubt would have envied the man’s success and admired his good business sense. It is only in 12:20 that the trap is sprung: there is another dimension to life, which neither the farmer nor Jesus’s hearers have taken into account. There is a play on words that is lost in translation: the man speaks complacently to his “self,” but it is that very “self” that will be demanded from him. Even his own “self” is not his own, but God’s (“demanded” is a term used for collecting a loan).
12:21 This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but are not rich toward God. The parable is not teaching that no provision should be made for the future; its message is that our relationship with God must take precedence over our selfish concerns. The story focuses on the farmer’s thoughts about himself: note the repeated “I” and “my” and the advice to himself to enjoy life rather than use his wealth more constructively. But we are stewards, rather than outright owners, of our wealth, and we are accountable to God for how we use it.
Theological Insights
Various aspects of judgment feature in these verses:
the future revelation of what is at present hidden
the only mention in Luke of “hell” (though 16:19–31 will speak of punishment after death)
repudiation in heaven of those who did not acknowledge Jesus on earth
a sin (blasphemy against the Holy Spirit) for which there is no forgiveness
a reminder that our life and death are in the hands of God
In all these aspects it is God who is in control. It is God, and only God, who can consign people to hell. But those who are loyal to God can face future judgment with confidence. It is only those who fail to acknowledge his lordship (“fear him”) in this life, and especially those who take a clear stand against him (“blaspheme against the Holy Spirit”), who have cause to fear. For the true disciple, death is not something to be afraid of.
Teaching the Text
In 12:1–12 we find seven distinct sayings (12:1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, 8–9, 10, 11–12), which may originally have been independent before Luke brought them together here. Any or all of these can be a suitable unit for teaching, but it is probably fairer to Luke to treat them together and aim to draw out some of the aspects of judgment outlined in “Theological Insights” above.
Encourage listeners to focus on the contrasting exhortations “Fear him” (12:5) and “Don’t be afraid” (12:7) and to reflect on the place of “fear” in the Christian life.
The “unforgivable sin” is often a source of worry to sensitive Christians. Here in 12:10 it lacks a clear context to define what “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit” might mean in practice. Consider the parallels in Mark and Matthew, where the context is much more specific, and discuss in what ways such a sin might be committed today.
The tension between 12:9 (those who disown Jesus will be disowned) and 12:10 (those who speak against the Son of Man may be forgiven) should be explored. Are they talking about different categories of people?
The parable of the successful farmer makes a sharp division between earthly prosperity and spiritual well-being. What does this mean in practice? Is there a clear dividing line between responsible provision and an unhealthy preoccupation with possessions? Is it possible to be a rich disciple? How might the message of this parable be applied to the “prosperity gospel”?
Illustrating the Text
Fear of human opposition must be outweighed by our ultimate loyalty to God.
Christian History: Fox’s Book of Martyrs. This book, a renowned work of church history and martyrology, is an abridgement of Actes and Monuments (1563) and has gone through many editions. Also available are many recent accounts of those killed as a result of ministering and witnessing in the name of Christ.
Our final salvation depends on our willingness to acknowledge God.
Biography: Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther, by Roland Bainton. In the face of being called before the emperor who was threatening him, Luther (1483–1546) declared:
You ask me what I shall do if I am called by the emperor. I will go even if I am too sick to stand on my feet. If Caesar calls me, God calls me. If violence is used, as well it may be, I commend my cause to God. He lives and reigns who saved the three youths from the fiery furnace of the king of Babylon, and if He will not save me, my head is worth nothing compared with Christ. This is no time to think of safety. I must take care that the gospel is not brought into contempt by our fear to confess and seal our teaching with our blood.1
Those who focus on earthly gain may find that they have missed the essence of true life.
Bible: Ecclesiastes 2:17–21. This passage is a powerful “commentary in advance” on the parable of the rich fool.
Poetry: “The Pulley,” by George Herbert. In this poem Herbert (1593–1633), a Welsh-born English poet, orator, and pastor, expresses the necessity to hold blessings and riches with a loose hand.
When God at first made Man,
Having a glass of blessings standing by—
Let us (said He) pour on him all we can;
Let the world’s riches, which dispersed lie,
Contract into a span.
So strength first made a way,
Then beauty flow’d, then wisdom, honour, pleasure:
When almost all was out, God made a stay,
Perceiving that, alone of all His treasure,
Rest in the bottom lay.
For if I should (said He)
Bestow this jewel also on My creature,
He would adore My gifts instead of Me,
And rest in Nature, not the God of Nature:
So both should losers be.
Yet let him keep the rest,
But keep them with repining restlessness;
Let him be rich and weary, that at least,
If goodness lead him not, yet weariness
May toss him to My breast.2