John 12:1-11 · Jesus Anointed at Bethany
Love Is Down to Earth
John 12:1-11
Sermon
by Carl Jech
Loading...

The poor you always have with you, but you do not always have me. (John 12:8)

Like me, I suppose, you have probably wondered about the popularity of such TV shows as "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous," "Dallas," and "Dynasty." It would seem that our value systems have become much too materialistic. One wonders if any really serious attempts are being made to close the gap between the rich and the poor. It has been observed that even "socialists" who seem to be interested in the welfare of poor people do not really so much love the poor; it is, rather, that they hate the rich!

Our story here is from John rather than Luke. When John's Gospel shows us Jesus telling his disciples "the poor you always have with you," are we seeing a Jesus who is less sympathetic to the poor and oppressed than the Jesus we see in Luke? Does Luke virtually hate the rich, the comfortable, the establishment ... and does John correct this imbalance by showing Jesus willing to indulge in a little luxury, willing to put his concern for the poor on hold and attend to a socially approved custom? Some commentators have expressed shock at this apparent callousness on the part of Jesus toward the poor. Does Jesus, at least as John sees him, believe that poverty and suffering are inevitable and that efforts to eliminate it are hopeless? (The Buddhist-styled group called Eckankar does teach that it is a sinful waste of time to try to reform this world because only the next world matters.)

When Jesus says that we will not always have him with us as we will always have the poor, we might conclude that Jesus is indulging in some unseemly self-congratulation, that he is setting himself off from, above, and over against the poor. It is true that by the time the Gospel of John was written in the form that we have it today, the early church had developed a much stronger conviction of Jesus as a triumphant victor over sin and death, but this was nothing like the naive theology of glory "for winners only" that we have been warning ourselves against.

The absolutely essential thing to notice is that even in John's exalted images of Jesus as the Good Shepherd, The Resurrection and the Life, The Truth, etc., Jesus himself never stops being one of the poor! Jesus is not saying "forget the poor and pay attention to me." He is saying, rather, "quit talking about 'the poor' in general and pay attention to the specific poor, needy person right in front of you!" Just as the philosophers Immanuel Kant and Martin Buber have insisted that we must treat people as ends in themselves rather than as simply means to end, so Jesus is pictured by John as wanting to be treated as an end in himself and not just as a means to an end. Jesus is not just a symbol of the poor and oppressed; he is himself specifically "stricken, smitten and afflicted."

The musical Hair has within it a most provocative song called "Easy To Be Hard." The gist of the song is that it is easy to "care about the bleeding crowd" while yet totally ignoring "a needy friend." A little joke you may have heard makes the same point: "I love mankind ... it's people I can't stand!" Jesus does not set himself apart from the poor. He simply points out that he himself, as one of the specific poor, has needs - and that Mary has been sensitive to those needs. By contrast, Judas pretends to be concerned for the poor (in general) but is actually only concerned about himself.

We must also be sure to notice that Jesus relates the costly ointment not to his own personal glorification but to his burial. To the degree that this "luxury" is a symbol, it is a symbol of his humble self-sacrifice unto death. Even more than his humble birth, Jesus' death on the Cross is the ultimate expression of his identification with the poor and lowly!

In his thoughtful, questioning lyrics for the musical Jesus Christ, Superstar, Tim Rice gives this slant to the words of Jesus: "Surely you're not saying we have the resources to save the poor from their lot? ... Think! while you still have me. Move! while you still see me." The suggestion is that in the larger scheme of things we have to set priorities and sometimes that means putting a specific need above a general problem. For example, we do need to put resourcesinto political and economic efforts to change and improve the system whereby we distribute the world's wealth. We can and should engage in political advocacy on behalf of justice. But there are also times when specific, emergency relief is needed in a crisis. According to Tim Rice, Jesus is saying in this story that this special moment in time, this "kairos moment" (as the Greeks would call it), must take precedence over the long-term general concern for the welfare of all poor, oppressed and lowly people. Jesus is in crisis and it is time to get down to brass tacks!

In fact, this metaphor of getting down to brass tacks expresses one of the most important features of biblical theology. In many ways, the Bible is an extremely down-to-earth book. Most specifically, it is about love coming down to earth. The Christmas story is the story of God's love come down to earth. It is the story of Emmanuel - God with us. It is the story of "incarnation," God in the flesh! God is indeed involved where the rubber hits the road. Martin Luther put it somewhat differently when he said, "God is interested in a lot of things besides religion." Whatever is done for "the least of these" is done for God. "The cup of water given for you still holds the freshness of your grace."

One facet of this down-to-earth character of the Bible is the earthy tone of many incidents described. The biblical writers are quite matter-of-fact about describing sexual matters and bodily functions. Some contemporary authors like James Nelson in Embodiment (Augsburg) and Larry Uhrig in Sexual Ethics (Alyson Publications) show how this honest earthiness could help us replace overly "sex-negative" attitudes with "sex-positive" attitudes. In an over-zealous concern to warn about the dangers of misused sexuality, many people develop a basically sex-negative outlook which is not in keeping with the biblical concept of the goodness of creation. In the story of Lazarus, John is not squeamish about mentioning the stink of a man dead four days (John 11:39), and Luke tells us in Acts chapter 8 of the eunuch, a person considered by many to be a sexual outcast, who becomes one of the important converts to Christianity. Christian love is truly down-to-earth!

Another facet of the Bible's down-to-earthness is evident precisely in its concern for the poor. Overall, the biblical writers are not anti-materialistic. They are critical only of the wrong kind of materialism - selfish materialism. Earthly goods are not to be ignored or destroyed. They are to be shared! Pete Seeger, the folk-singer, has said that "share" is a better word than "love." He has a point. We also fall prey to the wrong kind of materialism if we adopt "success" as a model for the New Testament Gospel. Too often the oversimplified message goes out that "spiritual success" will lead to material success, when in fact the Gospel of Jesus promises neither forms of "success." We can agree with the pundit who has dubbed such "success gospels" as "mindless, shallow, consumerist approaches to Christianity."

Jesus' reference to the poor who are always with us reminds us of his other specific references to the poor, particularly in the Beatitudes: "Blessed are the poor" (as Luke has it) or "the poor in spirit" (as in Matthew), "for theirs is the Kingdom of heaven." While it is likely that Luke's version refers to the down-to-earth poverty of the poor, it is possible that, like Matthew's version, it also refers to the blessedness of those whose piety is simple. As noted in the Ash Wednesday sermon, the New Testament celebrates "the piety that isn't." True piety is a simple piety that will spend at least as much money on feeding the hungry, for example, as on promoting television shows. One critic referred to "Moral Sloberts" as his way of satirizing the self-agrandizing form of so-called evangelism. When Oral Roberts was saying that the Lord would "call him home" if he didn't raise eight million dollars, a black minister appearing on the Oprah Winfrey Show provided perhaps the best and most insightful response. He said that it seemed somewhat presumptious to reduce God's purview to concern over a mere eight million dollars! God does have ways of calling us back to simple piety, of calling us back down to earth!

In the upcoming series of Easter sermons we will meet quite a number of times the theme of Jesus' words in this text: "you do not always have me." The church and the Scriptures have developed a number of ways of describing how Jesus remains present with us here on earth even though physically he obviously is "no longer with us." One of these ways of explaining how Jesus is in a sense still concretely with us is the concept of the "apostolic succession." In some churches this is taken to mean that there is an unbroken line of succession and ordination directly from Jesus through the apostles to the priesthood of the church today. In others, "apostolic succession" is seen as referring more simply to the unbroken tradition of the authentic teaching of the Gospel by anyone who truly teaches it. The ecumenical debate between those who stress the authority of the ordained clergy as literal successors of Jesus and those who stress the "spiritual" succession of the "true preaching and teaching of the Gospel" is one of the major roadblocks to formal Christian unity today. Perhaps if both sides will be more humble and recognize the dangers of yelling too stridently about who represents the true church, we will all remain true to the simple piety that Jesus referred to when he said "Blessed are the poor in spirit."

Finally, let us ask what down-to-earth evangelism should be all about. Some would insist that it means concrete concern for adding numbers of people to membership rolls. But it should ever be our conscious goal. It is likely that people can tell whether we are really interested in their needs and concerns or whether we are simply after "members." We are called not to pursue growth for growth's sake, but as Pastor Timothy Wright of Glendale, Arizona has written, to speak only in terms of "growth for the sake of others." Just as happiness comes as a by-product of a meaningful life rather than as the result of a conscious "pursuit of happiness," so organizations including the church, grow as a by-product of real concern for people. A recent People magazine article told of sister Anne Brooks, a doctor and nun, who "practices without preaching to the poor in a battered Mississippi delta town." Significantly, she is a member of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, and she clearly understands what the name Jesus means. Her humility is awe-inspiring. She says: "I'm not here to make anybody Catholic. The faith of these people is deeper than my own ... This place has changed me so much. I'm less selfish ... I've learned not to expect instant results ... because you learn from poor people how to wait ... I receive much more from these people than I could ever give them."

The Reverend Cathy Hagstrom George has written of her work in women's prisons in Massachusetts: "Jesus became one of the despised and rejected of his society, and it is among these (poor and despised people) that his words and teaching have the most power. In all of his dealings with people, one fundamental change transpires ... their dignity is restored ... he restores the value and worth of the person in whatever way it was missing ... I have come to know criminals who are first and foremost victims - victims of poverty, addiction, sexism, racism, abuse and violence ... The moral reality of the Christian message is that we are all, in the eyes of God, equally needy and equally deserving of God's tender mercy ... My teachers have been women I have come to know and love, despair and grieve over. Through them I have been made aware of the powerful presence of God in those who suffer yet still hope."

Here we glimpse what it means to say that the love of Jesus is truly down-to-earth, even if we don't literally have him with us. Lent is a time to contemplate the many poets who have asked "Where is Christ being sacrificed now?", a time to see how we are all in need of God's grace, a time to look for down-to-earth ways of sharing God's love.

C.S.S. Publishing Company, Channeling Grace, by Carl Jech