These books originally formed a single book and were first
divided into separate books in the LXX. The book of Kings recounts
the history of Israel from the time of Solomon (c. 970 BC) to the
destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BC. Kings continues the narrative of
2 Samuel, with 1 Kings 1:1–2:11 concluding the story
of David. The book has many references back to David (see the
promises to David in 2 Sam. 7:1–17; 1 Kings 8:14–26),
and prophecy spoken in earlier books reaches its fulfillment only in
Kings (e.g., prophecy against Jericho [Josh. 6:26; 1 Kings
16:34] and against the house of Eli [1 Sam. 2:27–36;
3:11–14; 1 Kings 2:27]), showing that it is actually part
of a larger historical work beginning in Joshua and ending in
2 Kings.
Authorship
and Date
The
book of Kings is anonymous. From the text itself, however, we can
deduce a probable situation for its composition. The end of Kings
tells the story of the destruction of Jerusalem (c. 586 BC) and
the beginning of the Babylonian exile, with the last event narrated
(the freeing of Jehoiachin to eat with the Babylonian king) dating to
around 560 BC. Therefore, Kings as we know it could not have been
composed prior to these events. It is unlikely that the book was
written after the exile; otherwise, the author would have referred to
the return to Jerusalem. This puts the date of the composition of
Kings to the period when Judah was in Babylonian exile and probably
between 560 and 539 BC.
However,
parts of the book clearly were written before the exile. The author
of Kings drew on a variety of sources, three of which are explicitly
referred to in the text (though none survive today): “the book
of the annals of Solomon” (1 Kings 11:41), “the book
of the annals of the kings of Israel” (1 Kings 14:19), and
“the book of the annals of the kings of Judah” (1 Kings
14:29). These explicit references to sources direct the reader to
information not given in Kings, leaving open the possibility that
even more sources were used. The book of Chronicles suggests that
prophets who were active in the reigns of the various kings of Judah
and Israel were sources for the author of Kings (e.g., 2 Chron.
9:29 lists the prophets Nathan, Ahijah, and Iddo as sources for the
history of Solomon). So the Bible itself tells us that multiple
sources were used to compose Kings, and that some of these sources
stem from God’s prophets. It is no wonder that in Jewish
tradition the section of the Bible in which Kings is set has been
called the “Former Prophets.”
Some
scholars believe that a first edition of Kings was written before the
exile and may have come out during King Josiah’s reign (c. 609
BC). Josiah is an important figure in the story: his birth is
prophesied (1 Kings 13:2) three hundred years in advance, and he
restores true worship, living up to the ideal set by David (2 Kings
22:2; 23:25). Josiah’s religious reforms may have originally
been the climax to this first edition of Kings, which hoped that
Josiah would fulfill the Davidic promises and was written to support
Josiah’s reforms. After the exile, this preexilic book was
updated in light of the apostasy of the later kings of Judah in order
to explain that the destruction of Jerusalem resulted from the sins
of these kings (e.g., 2 Kings 24:3). This second edition of
Kings is what came to be the canonical book of Kings as we know it.
Genre
The
genre of Kings is clearly that of historiography (history writing),
as it presents an account of Israel’s past. Kings is an
extraordinary literary achievement. Prior to its composition, there
was nothing that can properly be called “history writing”
in the ancient world. Since the writing of Samuel–Kings
predates Greek historiography, many scholars view them as the first
history ever written.
When
treating Kings as history, we must remember that it is not history as
we would write it today. The author had chiefly theological reasons
for his selection of material, and at times he refers to divine
causation to the exclusion of any human factors. For example, 2 Kings
15:37 says that God sent the kings of Aram and Israel against Judah,
but it does not comment on the political reasons for the attack (such
reasons surely would have existed). Conversely, modern historiography
would focus solely on the human reasons for an event and exclude any
possible divine causation. In this way, Kings does not live up to the
standard of history writing as practiced today, though as ancient
history writing it is an exemplar.
The
history contained within Kings has been corroborated by extrabiblical
material in many ways and fits well into an overall ancient Near
Eastern historical context. For example, the names of many of the
kings referred to in the book have also been found in ancient
Assyrian sources. Kings, however, does not agree perfectly with what
we otherwise know about the history of the ancient Near East, and
some adjustment is necessary to make it fit with other evidence.
However, if the partial nature of archaeological evidence and the
acknowledgment of the selectivity of the author of Kings are taken
into account, radical distrust of its history is not justified, as it
proves itself quite trustworthy.
Style
Kings
is brilliantly written and contains some of the most memorable
stories in the Bible. Although it is a historical writing, Kings,
like any good novel, contains both round (e.g., Ahab) and flat (e.g.,
Omri) characters. Its plot is compelling as it tells the history of
the kingship in Israel from its apex under Solomon in all his glory
down to the loss of the kingdom, already foreshadowed in 1 Kings
9:6–9. It begins as a story about one nation under God, but it
becomes the tragic story of two nations that continually turn away
from their God only to finally be judged by him.
The
Plan of the Book
Kings
gives an account of each of the kings of Israel and Judah, noting
when he began to reign, his age at accession, the length of his
reign, the name of his mother, and an evaluation of his reign. The
evaluation of each king is concerned not with economics or military
success; rather, the kings are judged either to have “done evil
in the Lord’s sight” or to have “done what was
right in the Lord’s sight,” depending on their
faithfulness to God and the purity of the nation’s worship. The
gauge for judging the kings is the law of Deuteronomy. According to
Deuteronomy, God should be worshiped only in the “place the
Lord will choose” (Deut. 12:26; see also vv. 5, 11, 14, 18),
making worship at other sanctuaries illegitimate. Proper worship of
God is without the use of aids such as images (e.g., “calves”
[1 Kings 12:28–30] or “snakes” [2 Kings
18:4]) or poles, stone pillars, etc.). Deuteronomy heavily influenced
Kings and is quoted several times (e.g., 1 Kings 11:2; 2 Kings
14:6). In fact, the law book found during Josiah’s reign
(2 Kings 22:8) appears to be a form of the book of Deuteronomy
(as evidenced by the character of the reforms). Due to this
influence, the books of Deuteronomy through 2 Kings are widely
referred to as the Deuteronomistic History.
Themes
Wholehearted
reliance on God.
Kings is primarily concerned with proper worship and faithfulness to
God. David set the standard of having a heart “fully devoted to
the Lord” (1 Kings 15:3) and is the measuring stick by
which all the southern kings are judged. Thus, Solomon is contrasted
with David when Solomon falls away from God (1 Kings 11:4), and
when Hez-e-kiah trusts in God, he is compared with David (2 Kings
18:3). In northern Israel Jeroboam and Ahab are the models of the
degenerate king. Jeroboam is known for setting up golden calves
(1 Kings 12:28) in northern Israel to be used in the worship of
Yahweh, and Ahab is infamous for his promotion of Baal worship in
Israel (1 Kings 16:30–33). In Kings, when kings of Israel
are assessed, they are often said to partake in Jeroboam’s sins
(2 Kings 10:31) or judged for doing “as Ahab king of
Israel had done” (2 Kings 21:3; see also 8:18, 27; 21:3).
This apostasy culminates in the destruction of the northern kingdom
by Assyria in 722 BC (2 Kings 17).
Exclusive
commitment to Yahweh meant that the worship of other gods was the
worst sin of the Israelite kings, and their fortunes were connected
to their policies regarding the worship of Yahweh. Throughout its
story, Kings contrasts the themes of apostasy and religious reform.
Beginning with Jeroboam, most of the kings are apostates and fail to
worship properly. Four Judean Kings (Asa, Jehoshaphat, Amaziah, and
Azariah) undertake some religious reforms, but they fall short of the
ideal. Near the end of the story, two Judean kings fulfill the ideal:
Hezekiah and Josiah. Yet following their reforms the next king turns
to even greater apostasy, bringing God’s judgment on the
nation.
The
fulfillment of the prophetic word.
Prophets are prominent in the story of Kings, with both famous
(Isaiah, Elijah, Elisha) and anonymous prophets (e.g., 1 Kings
13) playing important roles as bearers of the prophetic word of God.
Many short-term prophecies are fulfilled in the story of Kings (e.g.,
1 Kings 13:11–32), where the reader can perceive a pattern
of prophecy and fulfillment that helps to structure the story of
Kings. The way a prophecy is fulfilled is often surprising (see the
prophecy of 1 Kings 20:42 and its fulfillment in 1 Kings
22:34–35). The prediction of Josiah’s birth and reform
centuries in advance ties together the beginning of Kings with one of
the most significant events near the end of the book. This shows how
historical events are at the mercy of the Lord of history and his
prophetic word.
New
Testament Connections
Throughout
Kings the southern kingdom of Judah has Davidic kings on the throne
right up until the exile (compared to the northern kingdom of Israel,
which changed dynasties ten times). However, the destruction of
Jerusalem appears to end the Davidic dynasty. Will the promises to
David ever come true? The concluding paragraph at the end of Kings,
which describes Jehoiachin, the last king from David’s line,
being freed from prison and allowed to eat with the Babylonian king,
is messianic and holds out hope that the promises to David will be
fulfilled. Jehoiachin represents the hope for the future deliverance
of Israel and of the world. In 2 Kings 25:28 it is told how the
new king of Babylon “spoke kindly to [Jehoiachin] and gave him
a seat of honor higher than those of the other kings who were with
him in Babylon.” Here, the Hebrew word for “seat of
honor” is literally the word for “throne.” Thus,
Kings ends with a son of David on the throne! The promises to David
are still intact. The line of Judah survives, and a tiny shoot has
begun to sprout from the stump of David, which will culminate in the
Messiah himself. The promise that a son of David would rule is never
again fulfilled, except in Jesus Christ, who is now at the right hand
of the throne of God and will return one day.
Outline
I.
The United Monarchy: The Reign of Solomon (1 Kings 1:1–11:25)
II.
The Division of the Kingdom (1 Kings 11:26–14:31)
III.
The Divided Kingdoms of Israel and Judah (1 Kings 15:1–16:22)
IV.
The Dynasty of Omri and the Baal Cult in Israel and Judah (1 Kings
16:23–2 Kings 12)
V.
The Divided Kingdoms of Israel and Judah (2 Kings 13–16)
VI.
The Fall of Israel (2 Kings 17)
VII.
The Kingdom of Judah Alone (2 Kings 18–23)
VIII.
The Fall of Judah (2 Kings 24–25)