All-Israel Anoints David at Hebron: Whereas the previous narrative about Saul formed the introduction to the Chronicler’s description of David’s kingship, the next section narrates David’s actual anointing and coronation as king and the consolidation of his military power. It is quite clear that the Chronicler wanted to get to this point in his historical description as swiftly as possible. For that reason he skips over some events that are considered important in the Deuteronomistic History (see 2 Sam. 1–4), for example, the interim reign of Ish-Bosheth.
Some commentators see a ring structure in this section. According to this view, 1 Chronicles 11:1–9, which tells that All-Israel came to Hebron to crown David, and 12:38–40, which narrates the actual coronation and celebration of David, form the outer circle of this narrative. Included in this circle then are subsections describing the support that David gathered at Hebron (11:10–47 and 12:23–37), at Ziklag (12:1–7 and 12:19–22), and at the stronghold in the desert (12:8–15 and 12:16–18). However, there are also some good arguments why different delimitations can be made. In my division of the subsections I take as the point of departure the different place names or geographical locations that feature in these verses. First Chronicles 11:1–3 is situated in Hebron. In 11:4–9 the location moves to Jebus, which was captured to become the City of David. First Chronicles 11:10–47 contains indications of different military groups who supported David; there is some confusion about the location where this happened. First Chronicles 12:1–7 and 12:19–22 indicate the men who joined forces with David at Ziklag, the section in between (12:8–18) has the desert stronghold as setting, and 12:23–40 is again located in Hebron.
11:1–3 The Chronicler used the material in 2 Samuel 5:1–3 to compile the introduction to the David narrative. The location is Hebron, from where David reigned for the first few years of his kingship. Whereas the source text indicates that “the tribes of Israel came to David,” the Chronicler made slight changes to both the verb and subject. He substituted “the tribes of Israel” (clearly associated with the northern part of the kingdom) with all Israel—a clear indication again of the Chronicler’s intention to define an all-inclusive community here. The verb was changed from “came” to came together (literally “gathered”). This verb is used at various important occasions in Chronicles, often in connection with cultic gatherings or the tribes of Judah and Benjamin (e.g., 1 Chron. 13:2; 2 Chron. 15:9, 10; 18:5; 20:4; 23:2; 24:5; 25:5; 32:4, 6). The Chronicler presents this event, the anointment of David as king over All-Israel, as the first in the row of significant events that shaped the past.
Some small changes were made in 1 Chronicles 11:2 compared to the source text in 2 Samuel 5:2. The first of these hints at the Chronicler’s underplaying of Saul’s kingship over Israel again. Whereas the source text has “while Saul was king over us,” Chronicles has while Saul was king, omitting the words “over us.” Furthermore, the same verse quotes the words of Yahweh, which indicate that David is to be a shepherd and a ruler. Whereas the source text refers to “the LORD,” Chronicles states the LORD your God. This emphasizes the close relationship between Yahweh and David.
Another addition in 11:3 puts further emphasis on the relationship between Yahweh and David. To the source text’s statement “and they anointed David king over Israel” (2 Sam. 5:3) the Chronicler added the words as the LORD had promised through Samuel. This addition indicates that the Chronicler knew the source texts (where Samuel’s involvement is elaborately narrated) and also introduces a prophetic figure for the first time. As elsewhere in Chronicles, the prophet acts here as explicator of Yahweh’s involvement in the royal history. This role of prophets is a prominent feature of the book and will be discussed more fully in a later section of this commentary.
The information about David’s reign in 2 Samuel 5:4–5 is not present at this point in the Chronicler’s construction. A similar summary is given near the end of the Chronicler’s David narrative in 1 Chronicles 29:27, but that text was probably taken over from the version in 1 Kings 2:11. Since the Samuel text from Qumran (4QSama) also did not contain this information, one could assume that the Chronicler made use of a source text without the information.
11:4–9 The setting now changes to Jerusalem. Although the Chronicler made use of his source text 2 Samuel 5:6–10 here, he made some significant changes to it. The first change is in line with the use of the concept All-Israel. Whereas the source text indicates that “the king and his men” went up to Jerusalem to capture the city from the Jebusites, Chronicles mentions that David and all the Israelites went up. The same Hebrew concept as the one above is used here. The taking of Jerusalem is indicated to be a national event and not merely the endeavor of a few men together with David.
The Chronicler furthermore (and differently from the source text) comments on Jerusalem parenthetically: Jerusalem, that is, Jebus. This is one of only three places in the Old Testament where the name Jebus occurs (the others are Josh. 18:28 and Judg. 19:10). The connection with Jebus and the Jebusite land is quite significant. First Chronicles 21 indicates that the temple was built on the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite. Although the argument will be presented more fully below in the discussion of 1 Chronicles 21, I note here that the explication of Jebus might be the way in which the Chronicler claimed that David’s city and the temple were established in neutral terrain between Judah and Benjamin.
Another significant change in Chronicles is the omission of the mocking remark of the Jebusites (in 2 Sam. 5:6) that David will never be able to conquer the city, since “even the blind and the lame can ward you off.” According to the source text, David then challenges his men to use the “water shaft” (Hebrew tsinnor) to reach the blind and the lame. Second Samuel 5:8 furthermore provides an etiological indication: “That is why they say: ‘The blind and the lame will not enter the palace.’” There is no certainty among commentators what these comments in 2 Samuel mean. The difficulty of the passage might be the reason why the Chronicler also simplified the Jebusites’ mocking of David by not mentioning the blind and the lame. However, it is also possible that these references could have cast a shadow over David, and that that might have been the reason for the Chronicler’s omission.
The Chronicler also changed David’s challenge to his men to use the water shaft to conquer the city into an explanation of Joab’s prominence as commander-in-chief of David’s army. Although Joab is not mentioned in the source text in 2 Samuel 5, the Chronicler used the first part of the challenge, whoever leads the attack on the Jebusites, and then changed the second part into will become commander-in-chief. Joab, who is also mentioned in 1 Chronicles 21 in connection with David’s census, was first to attack, and he received the command. The Chronicler also adds to his source text when he mentions in 11:8 that Joab restored the rest of the city. It is clear that the Chronicler wanted to give a prominent place to Joab as the king’s commander in his reconstruction of the Davidic history.
11:10–47 This section lists the military support that David got from different groupings, as well as some of their heroic deeds. It is clear from the content that the section was probably composed from different anecdotes and lists to form a composite record of David’s support. But this was already present in the source text, 2 Samuel 23:8–39, which the Chronicler took over with only minor changes.
The composite nature of this literature probably explains the confusion about the location(s) where all this happened. First Chronicles 11:13 mentions that Eleazar, one of David’s mighty men, was at his side at Pas Dammim when the Philistines gathered there for battle. This location, which the Chronicler added to his source text, is unknown to us, but one may assume that it was in the Philistine area. In 11:15 (|| 2 Sam. 23:13) another location is given, namely, the cave of Adullam, but the next verse mentions the stronghold (|| 2 Sam. 23:14), which was probably near Bethlehem. For the rest of the chapter there is no specific indication of place.
First Chronicles 11:10 and 11:11 start with similar phrases, namely, these were the chiefs of David’s mighty men, and this is the list of David’s mighty men. In Hebrew these phrases are exactly the same except for the change from “chiefs” to “list.” The same phrase (again, with the exception of one word) also occurs in the source text in 2 Samuel 23:8: “these are the names of David’s mighty men.” It seems, therefore, that the Chronicler used the beginning of this section from his source text, but then added information (the rest of 11:10), only to resume again his quotation from the source text with the phrases in 11:11. The four pieces of information added by the Chronicler in 11:10 are very important for his ideology. Again all Israel was involved here, and they gave his kingship strong support in order to extend it over the whole land so that it could happen as the LORD has promised. One could say that this verse summarizes in a nutshell all the important themes that the Chronicler wanted to advance in his work.
In the next verses (11:11–14) the information was taken over from the source text with minor changes to the numbers as well as the omission of the name of one of David’s heroes (see Additional Note on 11:10–14).
With the change of location in 11:15 another group of three of the thirty chiefs is introduced in 11:15–19, together with their heroic deed of risking their lives to draw water for David from the well near the gate of Bethlehem. When David realized that he had risked the lives of his warriors, he refused to drink the water and rather poured it out before the LORD (information taken over from the source text). Some commentators suggest that this might have been a libation offering by David. However, it seems more likely that David considered the water to be the blood of his men (11:19) and that it therefore had to be poured out upon the ground (as ordered in Lev. 17:10–13 and Deut. 12:23–25, for blood contains life).
In the next verses (1 Chron. 11:20–25) two further warriors are introduced, namely, Abishai the brother of Joab and Benaiah son of Jehoiada. The Chronicler again took the information about these two warriors’ deeds from the source text in 2 Samuel 23:18–23. It is not clear how these two figures fit into the threesomes of heroes indicated in the text. However, the confusion was not caused by the Chronicler’s reworking, since it already occurs in the source text.
After the introduction of Abishai and Benaiah follows a long list (11:26–47) of David’s mighty men. First Chronicles 11:26–41a was taken over with minor changes from the source text in 2 Samuel 23:24–39, but 1 Chronicles 11:41b–47 is the Chronicler’s additions (probably from a source unknown to us). The point made by this long list of military supporters is that David drew support from all tribal areas and that he should be seen as the king of All-Israel.
12:1–40 The whole of 1 Chronicles 12 consists of the Chronicler’s own material (or, at least, is quoted from a source or sources unknown to us).
12:1–7 and 12:19–22 These sections are situated in Ziklag. First Chronicles 12:1–2 forms an introduction to the first list. It indicates again that the Chronicler presupposed his readers to have knowledge of the tension between Saul and David. He furthermore indicates that the warriors who came to David at Ziklag included kinsmen of Saul from the tribe of Benjamin. This remark consolidated support for David even from the ranks of Saul’s men. The Benjaminites, as we saw in an earlier discussion, were renowned as warriors. They are described here as armed with bows and were able to shoot arrows or to sling stones right-handed or left-handed. First Chronicles 12:3–7 then contains the names of these Benjaminite warriors who supported David.
First Chronicles 12:19–22 again has Ziklag as setting. This time the Chronicler indicates that men of Manasseh joined forces with David when he went with the Philistines to fight against Saul. First Chronicles 12:22 forms a conclusion indicating that day after day men came to help David and that his army grew until it was a great army, like the army of God. The latter expression emphasizes the immense size of David’s army. However, it also adds a theological dimension to David’s forces, as Klein indicates: “The human and divine participation in David’s military adventures is emphasized by comparing the human troops with an army of God” (1 Chronicles, p. 321).
12:8–18 First Chronicles 12:8 now moves the scene to David’s stronghold in the desert. First Chronicles 12:8–15 indicates those Gadites who defected to David to pledge their support for him. First Chronicles 12:16–18 then deals with other Benjaminites and some men from Judah, who also came to David at the “stronghold.” This scene again emphasizes the divine support for David in a dramatic way. David challenged these men, demanding to know why they came: If you have come to me in peace, to help me, or if you have come to betray me to my enemies. A very strong statement of support then came from Amasai, chief of the Thirty, after the Spirit came upon him. The Hebrew term used here can also be translated “the Spirit clothed him,” an expression that signifies, according to Klein, “someone who speaks with prophetic authority” (1 Chronicles, p. 319). Although the Hebrew text does not mention that “the Spirit” was Yahweh’s, one may assume this from the context. In the exclamation uttered by the Spirit-clothed Amasai, the theme of peace is very prominent (unfortunately, this is translated success in the NIV): Peace, peace to you, and peace to those who help you, for your God will help you (my translation). This first prophetlike utterance in Chronicles already introduces a prominent theological theme of the Chronicler, namely, that Yahweh’s involvement in the royal history of his people brings peace. This also occurs in further passages.
12:23–40 The setting of these verses is back in Hebron. First, in 12:23–38a the men armed for battle who came to David at Hebron are listed. Their purpose was to turn Saul’s kingdom over to him, as the LORD had said. This introduction links back to the remark at the end of the Saul narrative, namely, 1 Chronicles 10:13–14 (the Chronicler’s own material), which indicates that Yahweh was responsible for turning over the kingdom from Saul to David. The names listed here represent more or less the same tribal communities listed in the genealogies of 1 Chronicles 2–9: men of Judah (12:24), men of Simeon (12:25), men of Levi (12:26–28), men of Benjamin (12:29), men of Ephraim (12:30), men of half the tribe of Manasseh (12:31), men of Issachar (12:32), men of Zebulun (12:33), men of Naphtali (12:34), men of Dan (12:35), men of Asher (12:36), and from east of the Jordan, men of Reuben, Gad and the half-tribe of Manasseh (12:37). It is clear that the writer wanted to present a version of David’s support similar to that given in the genealogies: All-Israel supported this king!
After the list is presented, the discussion proceeds in 12:38 with the indication that they all came to Hebron with one intention, namely, fully determined to make David king over all Israel. The section then concludes with a description of the huge festivities in Hebron in celebration of David’s being anointed as king over All-Israel (see again 11:1–3). The supplies mentioned speak of affluence and generosity, and the concluding phrase is telling: for there was joy in Israel. The theme of joy, closely related to peace, rest, and quietness, is another prominent topic in Chronicles (see commentary on 1 Chron. 15–16). The Chronicler does not mention here that the festivities had any religious or ritual element to them. This was probably deliberate, since with no sanctuary at Hebron, such an indication would have been a blemish on David’s association with the cult in Jerusalem.
With the consolidation of support of All-Israel for David in 1 Chronicles 11–12, the Chronicler is now free to narrate the most significant event in David’s reign, namely, the bringing of the ark of the covenant to Jerusalem (1 Chron. 13–16).
Additional Notes
11:4–9 Scholars emphasize the difficulty of accepting the chronological order of events presented in Chronicles. It is highly unlikely that Jerusalem could have been conquered during the enthronement, as suggested by the sequence of events in the Chronicler’s text. The Chronicler’s presentation furthermore does not quite correlate with the indication that David reigned from Hebron for seven years (as also attested in 1 Chron. 29:27). Knoppers reminds us, however, that the writer probably did not place the conquering of Jerusalem here in the narrative for chronological reasons. He is rather applying to the figure of David an epic-heroic topos that is well established in ancient Near Eastern historiography, in which the most significant actions of the king are mentioned right at the outset of their reigns. Knoppers therefore calls this “an excellent example of achronological historiography” (1 Chronicles 10–29, p. 545). Since the Chronicler reorganized his source material from 2 Sam. 5:7–23:7, he has also brought the capturing of Jebus and the lists of mighty men following in 1 Chron. 11:10 together. Dirksen is of the opinion that this is done to establish a direct link between David’s kingship and the capture of Jerusalem (1 Chronicles, p. 159). Manfred Oeming offers an interesting explanation for why the Chronicler omitted the reference to the blind and the lame here. Second Sam. 5:8 contains David’s comment that the men had to use the “water shaft” (Hebrew tsinnor) to reach the blind and lame. Oeming suggests that the Hebrew term might be a euphemistic reference to the genitals and that David’s challenge to his men was to mutilate the blind and the lame. Oeming states that the Chronicler understood this reference all too well and therefore could not see his way clear to reusing this information. See M. Oeming, “Die Eroberung Jerusalems durch David in deuteronomistischer und chronistischer Darstellung (II Sam 5,6–9 und I Chron 11,4–8),” ZAW 106 (1994), pp. 404–20.
11:10–14 In the first list of chiefs of David’s mighty men, two names are listed together with some anecdotes about their heroics. These two are Jashobeam and Eleazar. Second Sam. 23:8 refers to the first person as “Josheb-Basshebeth,” however. The second name is the same in 2 Sam. 23:9, but a third name is also mentioned there, namely, “Shammah” in 2 Sam. 23:11. The name in 2 Sam. 23:8 is uncertain, since some Septuagint manuscripts suggest “Ish-Bosheth” instead of “Josheb-Basshebeth.” If there had been any uncertainty in the Chronicler’s time about the right name, one could suggest that the Chronicler deliberately chose another name in order not to make any association with Ish-Bosheth (whose presence is eliminated by the Chronicler). That Shammah is omitted by the Chronicler might be related to the elimination of 2 Sam. 23:10b–12 in the source text. Making the kind of reading error that often occurred during the copying of manuscripts in ancient times, the Chronicler’s eye might have skipped from “the LORD brought about a great victory” in 23:10 to exactly the same Hebrew phrase at the end of 23:12. The information in between these phrases, which contains the mention of Shammah, was thus accidentally omitted.
12:23–38a The large numbers of troops indicated in this section have been the topic of heated discussions among commentators. Some propose that the Hebrew word for “thousand” should rather be understood as a military unit. Although this proposal would make the numbers more realistic, it is unlikely that the word would have this meaning. Klein concludes that the high numbers are primarily theological and provide another example of the Chronicler’s All-Israel agenda (1 Chronicles, pp. 315–16).