Job 42:1-6 · Job Replies to the Lord
All Is Restored?
Job 42:1-17
Sermon
by Robert A. Hausman
Loading...

Our text brings us to the climax of the book of Job. Last week, the denouement began in chapter 38, with the ominous voice of God speaking to Job out of the whirlwind: "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up your loins like a man, I will question you, and you shall declare to me" (Job 38:2-3). Then, for two chapters, God thunders at Job, hammering away at his ignorance, his insignificance, his mere creatureliness. The sum of it is, "Shall a faultfinder contend with the Almighty? Anyone who argues with God must respond" (Job 40:2).

Job responds first by simply admitting his speechlessness. "See, I am of small account; what shall I answer you? I lay my hand on my mouth. I have spoken once, and I will not answer; twice, but will proceed no further" (Job 40:4-5). This is followed by two more chapters of divine rhetoric. By the time we are done with God's second speech, Job has been reminded of God's creation of the heavens and the earth, the whole natural world, the animal world, and even the mythical or primordial world, as symbolized by Behemoth and Leviathan! Once more Job responds, but this time with some substance.

The key to Job's response is given in terms of sight — or, in this case, we might say insight. We are familiar with the symbol of sight as used in the folk hymn, "Amazing Grace" — "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind, but now I see." Job contrasts his previous condition with his present sight by the adversative, "but." "But now my eye sees you" (v. 5b). How does Job characterize his previous condition?

First, he acknowledges that he was arguing out of ignorance. He quotes a line of God's (Job 42:3a), "Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?" (see 38:2). Then he admits, "Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know." This is simply an admission of ignorance.

Job begins his next point with another reference to God's speech. He quotes, "Hear, and I will speak; I will question you, and you declare to me" (v. 4). The second part of the sentence reflects 38:3b and 40:7b, but the first part seems to be a free parallel to the second, anticipating it and preparing for a contrast between hearing and seeing. God says, "Hear, and I will speak" just so Job can respond, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you" (v. 5).

This could be a way of saying that hearing God is an inadequate form of knowledge compared to actually seeing God. So, we say, "seeing is believing." But it is more likely to be consequential. Having listened, as God had demanded, so now he can say he actually sees. We are all familiar with Job's plea for a "redeemer" and for a time when, in his own flesh, he should see God, "whom I shall see on my side, and my eyes shall behold, and not another" (Job 19:27). Finally, Job gets to see!

Certainly Job's claim of "having seen God" suggests a powerful encounter with God. To "see" God is rare in Israelite tradition (see Exodus 24:9-11) and to use that verb to describe his insight makes us take note. The result of this seeing is introduced by "therefore," after which we get "I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes" (Job 42:6).

The verse is shocking and flies directly in the face of much of the human potential movement, which calls on us to "be all that you can be!" Despising oneself is the kind of groveling that no humanist can abide.

But the NRSV translation conceals some of the ambiguity that exists in the grammar of this sentence. The editors of the NRSV (Oxford Annotated Edition)2 point out that the word "despise" normally requires an object, but none is present. It has to be supplied from the context. What is it that Job despises? Himself? His attitude or behavior? His arguments? And what does it mean to repent "in dust and ashes," since the phrase can refer simply to the human condition ("all we are is dust in the wind") or to human degradation (Job 30:19; Sirach 40:3).

It is certainly possible to see in this verse a strong rebuke of Job's previous audacity, contemporary humanism not withstanding. After all, acknowledging one's creatureliness and submitting to God's will, even without satisfactory answers for our rational demands, is not necessarily a betrayal of the human. Indeed, it could be understood as the first step toward becoming fully human. If God is truly to be God and we God's creatures, then it may be that we find ourselves only by losing ourselves.

At the same time, the verse could refer, not so much to a difference in essence between creator and creature as to a difference in understanding of the cosmos. Job may have been insisting on an interpretation of tragedy (dust and ashes), which would make sense within a neat and orderly moral universe. In that case, perhaps his reply could be paraphrased. "I retract my argument demanding justification. I recognize that within the universe there will always be Behemoth, causing destruction beyond human control (40:15 ff). There will always be Leviathan, thrashing about wreaking havoc (ch. 41). I repent (change my mind) of/about dust and ashes; i.e., there are no easy answers to the complicated human condition. I must trust that you are in control, but it is not easy to see."3

But, if the struggle is how to preserve God's divinity (God is, after all, God) while at the same time not losing God's justice or goodness, then it is hard to see how the second half of the text helps us out of this dilemma. Is it really enough to say that God is ultimately in charge of Leviathan, but has chosen, for now, only to set boundaries on the monster? That is the question that the first part of the text leaves us with.

When we turn to the second part of the text, we get a conclusion to the prose narrative, which set the stage for the book in the first two chapters. This conclusion may be as troubling as the other. Whereas the poetic section is full of complicated arguments befitting the complexities of the situation, the narrative itself seems to operate on a much simpler plane. God, in due time, will sustain and reward the pious.

In this concluding section of the narrative, we are told that everything in Job's life is restored and more. "And the Lord restored the fortunes of Job when he had prayed for his friends; and the Lord gave Job twice as much as he had before" (Job 42:10). Job's brothers and sisters and "all who had known him before" shared bread with him, comforting him and even giving him money and gold rings for a new start. "The Lord blessed the latter days of Job more than his beginning; and he had fourteen thousand sheep, six thousand camels, a thousand yoke of oxen, and a thousand donkeys. He also had seven sons and three daughters" (Job 42:12-13). This restored life was an exceedingly long one — 114 years — in which he got to see four generations of progeny!

While this latter section has the superficial sense of bringing a happy ending to the folktale — they lived happily ever after — it does not stand up well to the scrutiny of the poetic chapters in the middle. Even if we were to suspend our disbelief about such a reversal of fortune, we would find it somewhat hard to see how a new family can replace the old. Even more so, can such an ending really bring satisfaction in the light of all the complicated questions raised by Job and his comforters?

Did the compilers of the lectionary fail us by putting these two texts together? Although they create the opportunity for a great deal of musing about the human condition, and although one can use them to debate the nature and character of God, is there any gospel to be found? Where is the good news?

One way to go at it would to be to look at the verses in the narrative which are omitted by the lectionary. After the Lord had spoken these words to Job, the Lord said to Eliphaz the Temanite:

7After the LORD had said these things to Job, he said to Eliphaz the Temanite, "I am angry with you and your two friends, because you have not spoken the truth about me, as my servant Job has. 8So now take seven bulls and seven rams and go to my servant Job and sacrifice a burnt offering for yourselves. My servant Job will pray for you, and I will accept his prayer and not deal with you according to your folly. You have not spoken the truth about me, as my servant Job has." 9So Eliphaz the Temanite, Bildad the Shuhite and Zophar the Naamathite did what the LORD told them; and the LORD accepted Job's prayer. 10After Job had prayed for his friends, the LORD restored his fortunes and gave him twice as much as he had before. — Job 42:7-10

According to this text, Job is portrayed as a righteous one, pleasing to God, who has spoken rightly about God. That, of course, does not correspond to the combative Job that we have seen in the poetic section, but to the docile Job of the folktale. In this conclusion to the folktale, Job is assigned the task of a priest who is able to restore the comforters in God's sight by praying for them and making sacrifice. Even though God is angry with them ("my wrath is kindled" — v. 7), God provides for their restoration through the priestly function of Job. This God is not aloof or detached, but is concerned about providing priests for the sake of reconciliation.

This same concern for salvation through a priestly function can be found in the second lesson for today, Hebrews 7:23-28. The letter presents Christ as our great high priest, appointed by God and able to sympathize with our weakness. "For it was fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, blameless, undefiled, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens" (Hebrews 7:26).

Hebrews takes pains to show that the priesthood that Christ exercises is far superior to the Levitical priesthood. In this lesson, the first point of superiority is longevity. "Furthermore, the former priests were many in number, because they were prevented by death from continuing in office; but he holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever" (Hebrews 7:23-24). This means that he is eternally available as our intercessor. "Consequently he is able for all time to save those who approach God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them" (Hebrews 7:25).

The second point of comparison is the "once-for-all" nature of his sacrifice. "Unlike the other high priests, he has no need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for those of the people; this he did once for all when he offered himself" (Hebrews 7:27).

In addition to these Christological insights from Hebrews, we can also make a point of contact with the Jesus of the gospel lesson for today, the healing of blind Bartimaeus (Mark 10:46-52). The miracle story comes as the conclusion to the third passion prediction unit which Mark sets up (10:32-45). First Jesus predicts his passion (10:31-34), then James and John show their misunderstanding by seeking greatness (10:35-40), followed by Jesus' reference to true greatness as servanthood (10:41-45). It is after this section, with its call for insight, that we get the story of Bartimaeus receiving his sight from Jesus, accompanied by the words, "Go; your faith has made you well" (10:52).

Just as Job was brought to sight by God's revelation ("but now my eye sees you" — 42:5b), and just as Bartimaeus regained his sight "immediately," so we are called to a new vision of God, one that goes beyond the realization of the great gulf between creator and creature. It is a vision of a God who, despite the fact that we are "dust and ashes," made provision for our salvation through our great high priest, who offered himself, once for all, for our sins. Like Bartimaeus, we too cry out, "Jesus, have mercy on me." To us, Jesus says, "Go; your faith has made you well." Like Bartimaeus, then, let us "follow him on the way." Amen.


1. Archibald MacLeish, JB (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1956), p. 136.

2. The New Oxford Annotated Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 672.

3. This is essentially the argument of Carol A. Newsome in The New Interpreter's Bible, Vol. IV (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996), pp. 628-629.

CSS Publishing Company, Sermons for Sundays after Pentecost (Last Third): From Emptiness to Fullness, by Robert A. Hausman