Mark 12:28-34 · The Greatest Commandment
The Thing about Laws
Mark 12:28-34
Sermon
by Steven Molin
Loading...

Our nation has a lot of stupid laws! For example, in North Dakota, "Beer and pretzels cannot be served at the same time in any bar or restaurant." In Alaska, "It is illegal to push a live moose out of a moving airplane." In Florida, "If an elephant is left tied to a parking meter, the parking fee has to be paid just as it would if it was a vehicle." And if not the most bizarre, then certainly the most obvious; In Alabama, "It is illegal for a driver to be blindfolded while driving a vehicle." But did you know that it is illegal to walk down Main Street in Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan, Canada, with your shoes untied? You can't make this stuff up!

Most laws trace their genesis to a need to protect someone from something. Maybe fifty years ago, some gold miner was minding his own business outside Nome, Alaska, when he was killed by a moose falling from the sky, and lawmakers vowed that it would never happen again. Today, Americans can no longer bring more than two ounces of shampoo, toothpaste, or shaving cream onto a commercial aircraft because they might be concocting a bomb. Fifty years from now, that might seem as silly as all the other laws listed above. That's the thing about laws; at one time, they made perfect sense to someone.

So, when one considers the laws of first-century Israel, we must cut some slack. For example, when we read that we should "remember the sabbath day and keep it holy," we wonder why the Jews could not even bandage an injured arm, or assist a woman in labor, or rescue someone who had fallen in a well on the sabbath. When we hear that ceremonial washing meant that diners needed to wash from their fingertips to their elbows before and after every course of a seven-course meal, we scratch our heads. And why on earth could a man divorce his wife for burning his dinner, and why can't Jews eat a cheeseburger (because mixing meat and dairy is outlawed), and why are certain foods considered "edible" if a rabbi supervised their processing? Please, I am not mocking these laws; I just don't entirely understand why they were created.

In today's gospel text, a teacher of the law quizzed Jesus on his knowledge of the Jewish catechism. "Rabbi, which commandment is above all others?" The list of possibilities is great, for there are 612 commandments in rabbinical law, which are taken from the five books of Moses, rabbinic literature, and oral tradition. The question does not seem to be a set-up, but rather a dialogue between two theologians in a public forum. And Jesus and the teacher agree that the most important commandment does not deal with washing or eating or resting rituals of Judaism, but rather, with love. You shall love the Lord with all your heart and soul and mind and strength, and you shall love your neighbor as yourself. There is no other commandment more important than these two.

The cynic would ask, "If the Jews believed that love trumped all other laws, why did they place so much emphasis (not to mention pride and punishment) on the other 611 laws? And in the spirit of "Why do you point out the speck in your neighbor's eye when you have a log in your own?" I would turn the question back to us. If love is still the gold standard for the followers of Jesus, why do we spend so much time and energy (not to mention pride and punishment) on the sins we see in the lives of others? What commandment is the greatest for the twenty-first-century Christian church? What impedes our focus on that commandment to love? If measured by volume alone, I would rank these five: homosexuality, abortion, drunkenness, adultery, and pedophilia. But doesn't the opinion of Jesus count for anything? Did his view of love change over the last 2,000 years? Of course, it didn't. Doesn't it stand to reason that the greatest commandments in Jesus' mind would still be "Love the Lord with all your heart, soul, mind and strength, and love your neighbor as yourself"?

There will be conflicting emotions in the answer to that question. Those who think that Christians must walk the walk and talk the talk or they are obviously not Christians will hold firm. They would demand righteousness from their sisters and brothers, and expect it of themselves. They would attempt to adhere to every law, and avoid every unsavory deed. To do otherwise would be to go soft on sin; "It's a slippery slope!" they would say. "Let's draw a line in the sand and say, ‘No more!' " They echo Karl Menninger's question in his classic piece written 35 years ago; "Whatever Became of Sin?" And there are some of those voices right here in this very church!

But others would counter with the question of author Phillip Yancy in his 1997 book, What's So Amazing About Grace? They would passionately argue that we are part of a fallen humanity and cannot honestly live righteous lives. They would remind us that Christ's work on the cross means that we don't have to earn God's love, or prove to anyone else that we're good enough. To do so would be to sink back into legalism and negate the redeeming work of Jesus. But what they will not admit is that grace can make us lazy; it can provide for us an excuse to live disobedient and cavalier lives because it's all been forgiven anyway. And there are some of those voices right here in this very church!

Dick Lowey, my old seminary mentor, said that the tension between law and gospel is a necessary struggle in the Christian life. He likened it to a violin, which needs to have the strings pulled tightly in both directions in order to play beautiful music; release the tension on either end, and the music is gone. And the "music" of course, is love. When we love God, we gladly accept his gift of grace that frees us from the penalty of our sins. But when we love God, we also want to please him with our obedience.

But what do we do with one another? How do we end the judgment and criticism and bickering and self-righteousness? It's been going on since Jesus called his first disciples, and the New Testament is filled with reports of petty disagreements and one-upsmanship? Shhh! Listen ... listen to the words of a theological debate from two millennia past:

You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength, and you shall love your neighbor as yourself.

It's all about love ... not laws.

There is a wonderful legend of John the apostle, the last living disciple of Jesus. There was a gathering of the church, and out of respect, the convener asked if John had anything to bring to the gathering. Slowly, painfully, John made his way to the podium and said, "Love one another" and then he sat down. The leader stood up and said "Brother John, is there anything else you would like to tell us?" Again, with great effort, this elder statesman of the church arose, and took his place at the podium; "Love one another." And he sat down.

When the meeting had ended, a young man in the congregation approached him and said "Brother John, why do you continually say that we should love one another?" And John smiled and said "Because, son, if we would do only this, it would be enough."

In a world of laws and legalism, church schisms and furious debate, theological positions and doctrinal stands, perhaps the missing ingredient all along has been that commandment upon which Jesus and the teacher agreed so many years ago; that we simply love the Lord and love our neighbors as ourselves. I wonder what that kind of world would look like. Thanks be to God. Amen.

CSS Publishing Company, Inc., Sermons for Sundays after Pentecost (Last Third):The Final Exam, by Steven Molin