Dictionary: Hope
Showing 1926 to 1950 of 4955 results

Understanding Series
Craig A. Evans
... into the presence of Jesus (cf. 4:35). Jesus both exorcised the demon and healed the boy. The phrase, gave him back to his father, echoes 7:15 (see 1 Kings 17:23). 9:43a And they were all amazed at the greatness of God: In view of the fact that it was Jesus who had just displayed his power, could this statement be a hint at the deity of Jesus? Compare Luke 8:39; Acts 20:28. On Discipleship This section is loosely tied together by the theme of discipleship and represents three successive units from Mark 9 ...

Understanding Series
Craig A. Evans
... the Sabbath. In view of this it has been suggested that the man suffering from dropsy (see note below) was a “plant,” a person asked to the house as part of the Pharisees’ attempt to put Jesus to the test. This may be the case, but the fact that after healing the sick man Jesus sent him away would suggest that he had not been one of the invited guests. In any case, the Pharisees are afforded the opportunity for which they had been seeking. Jesus, knowing that he was being watched carefully and knowing ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... 2 Apoc. Bar. 59:6; 4 Ezra 7:74. In addition, see the material gathered in Str-B, vol. 3, pp. 77–78. On presuming on God’s grace, note Franz Leenhardt’s words: “To know the good does not furnish us with a claim to divine indulgence. The fact that the hour of divine judgment has not yet struck does not by any means show that God judges us favourably.… History is the school of repentance, but we must learn the lesson and not squander our time” (Romans, p. 75). Of repentance Karl Barth says, What is ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... hypocrisy. Inwardly and outwardly repeat the teaching of 2:11, 16: the true sign of the covenant is a willing (= circumcised) heart, which includes inner conversion and moral renewal. Apart from such commitment, circumcision of the flesh is a meaningless mark; in fact, it is a sign of condemnation because it signifies the disparity between the ideal and the failure to live it out. Circumcision thus does not make one a Jew, but it reveals the Jew inwardly, circumcision of the heart (v. 29). The distinction ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... sis, translated redemption, was frequently used in the Hellenistic world with reference to ransom paid for prisoners of war or redemption from slavery. Not the least significant aspect of this word is its concreteness: it refers to an event rather than an idea, a fact which must have been of some consequence to the addressees of the epistle, many of whom (to judge from the names listed in chapter 16) were themselves slaves or freed persons. Redemption means an act on behalf of an inferior, e.g., a prisoner ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... Exod. 3:7–8). The end of verse 25 poses a problem for commentators who suppose Paul is speaking of his pre-Christian experience. How can the recipient of grace and salvation end on a note of slavery to sin? Many commentators and translators, in fact, either omit 25b or place it after verse 23. There is not a shred of evidence in the textual tradition for such a transposition, however, and a transposition is unnecessary if our thesis is correct. The chapter closes with a reminder that the Christian life ...

Romans 9:30--10:21
Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... , for the title “Lord” (Gk. kyrios; Heb. Yahweh) occurs as a proper name for God some 5000 times in the OT. Paul could not yet define the nature of Jesus (in the later words of the Nicene Creed) as “being of one substance with the Father,” but the fact that he freely applies the personal name of God in the OT to Jesus implies that Jesus shares the dominion of Israel’s God. What is true of God’s lordship is also true of Jesus’ lordship. To speak of Jesus is therefore to speak of God, and speech ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... explain it? If, as he states, he wanted “to preach the gospel where Christ was not known so that [he] would not be building on someone else’s foundation” (v. 20), why was he planning to visit Rome, which had already been evangelized? Might his epistle, in fact, be seen as an attempt to build on someone else’s foundation? In an opposite vein, might the Romans feel slighted if his road led not to Rome, but through it to Spain? And what contribution could Rome make to his Spanish mission, or might Paul ...

1 Corinthians 1:1-9
Understanding Series
Marion L. Soards
... called to be God’s holy ones along with the rest of the church universal—a sensible idea. Similar statements in 2 Cor. 1:1 and Phil. 1:1 strengthen the case for (2), despite the idea in (3) being easier to comprehend. Nevertheless, the fact that both (2) and (3) associate the Corinthians with all other Christians may mean that it is unnecessary to decide between these options; indeed, Paul and Sosthenes may have shades of both thoughts in mind, so that the ambiguity is deliberate. The second grammatical ...

1 Corinthians 12:12-31
Understanding Series
Marion L. Soards
... than immediately precedes v. 20. The logic of this line and the following verses brings to mind the popular maxim “One for all, and all for one.” Moreover, the opening words of the line are the same as those in v. 18, nun de (“But in fact”; NIV: As it is). These words introduce a conclusion that takes a degree of exception to foregoing reasoning as they introduce a new angle in logic. In agreement, see Conzelmann, 1 Corinthians, p. 213. 12:21 Notice that in this imaginary dialogue, the head is but ...

Revelation 8:6--9:21
Understanding Series
Robert W. Wall
... 4:5). Seven trumpets were also used to destroy Jericho (Josh. 6:4, 6, 8) and to establish Israel in God’s promised land. In fact, Caird thinks John has this story in mind when writing down this vision because the ark appears upon the blowing of the seventh trumpet (Rev ... the earth. Because they are evil agents from a spiritual world, they do not act like locusts of the natural world. In fact, they ignore the grass of the earth or any plant or tree and are ironically given power like that of scorpions to ...

1 Samuel 3:1–4:1
Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... seems unsure that Eli has it right, and although he obediently responds to the fourth call, he does not use the traditional formula that Eli had given him, Speak, LORD. Instead he omits the name of the Lord. In quoting direct speech the writers draw attention to that fact. When Eli asks for a report of the message he too is wary, asking what was it he (as opposed to the Lord) said to you, needing to hear the report before he concludes that He is the LORD. Samuel’s youth does not prevent him from being ...

1 Samuel 21:1-9
Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... was normally restricted to priestly families. At a later stage, Uriah’s adherence to the rule for troops under David’s control brought disaster to both of them (2 Sam. 11). Doeg’s presence and the fact that he was Saul’s man is noted by the writers and, as we are informed in 22:22, by David, although the fact is not detailed at this point. David was aware that Goliath’s sword was at Nob and that it was probably the only weapon there; this would explain why he had headed for Nob. Metal weapons ...

Understanding Series
Gerald H. Wilson
... and battered. Rather, it is clear that Yahweh is always in control and that the test proceeds with his knowledge and permission. In fact, Yahweh initiates the discussion when he trots Job out as the epitome of human righteousness, using the terms from verse 1 to ... proposes the only kind of test that can prove the case. This is not a wager, since neither party will gain anything. In fact, the test in no way benefits either God or Job—who both know and affirm Job’s righteousness—nor does it benefit the ...

Job 11:1-20
Understanding Series
Gerald H. Wilson
... ; Job employed this verb himself in 9:23 when he claimed that God “mocks the despair of the innocent”). Zophar fears that, without a firm rebuke, Job’s many words will reduce men to silence, and it will seem like he has won. This is, in fact, exactly what happens at the end of the third cycle of dialogue. Bildad’s third (and last) speech is severely truncated, while Zophar (ironically, in view of his comments here) fails to speak at all. The effect is to suggest that Job’s friends are unable to ...

Understanding Series
Gerald H. Wilson
... more than severe pruning by the gardener who hopes to enliven a failing tree. This is the final destruction of a rejected tree preceding its complete removal (he uproots). The symbolic nature of the uprooted tree is obvious since it is Job’s hope that is in fact uprooted. Note that Job’s hope does not fail on its own. Rather, it is forcibly removed and destroyed by the very one who should be the giver of hope! This destructive assault against his hope leads Job to conclude that God has placed him on the ...

Understanding Series
Gerald H. Wilson
... patently false. 22:4 Eliphaz begins to reveal his own estimation of Job’s character in the next pair of sarcastic questions. Having established that God is beyond the influence of Job’s presumed righteousness, Eliphaz can only conclude that Job’s suffering is in fact the just rebuke of God who brings charges against Job for his sin. The sarcasm is a slap at Job, as if to say, “If you are really as innocent as you claim, would God be rebuking you and taking you to court? Ridiculous!” Interestingly ...

Job 38:1--41:34
Understanding Series
Gerald H. Wilson
... righteous for no profit? We are sometimes tempted to think we could do a better job than God in ruling the universe. We would know how and when to humble and crush the wicked where they stand. We could bury them all in the dust together. The fact is that we cannot, and God does not. This forces us to acknowledge the failure of a simple theology of retribution as an adequate explanation of the real world. It also forces us to rely on divine grace rather than trade on our own righteousness. The righteousness ...

Understanding Series
Robert H. Mounce
... Joseph, the angel counseled that he not be afraid to take Mary home as his wife, since the child she will conceive is from the Holy Spirit (Matt. 1:20–23). There is no reason to question a twofold appearance of the angel. In fact, the situation calls for it. Other variations between the accounts are no more than what one would expect given the slightly differing purposes and perspectives of the writers. Jewish weddings involved three separate steps. First, there was the engagement. This was often arranged ...

Understanding Series
Craig C. Broyles
... who does what is righteous” (15:1–2). Although this may sound like a claim of moral perfection, the other psalm of temple entry (Ps. 24) makes clear that such a person still needs to “receive righteousness from his saving God” (24:5; see the commentary). In fact, 14:5 uses the same designation for “the company of the righteous” (Hb. dôr ṣaddîq) as found in 24:5–6 (where the NIV translates dôr as “generation”). Thus, “the righteous” are so-called not by their own merits but by the ...

Understanding Series
Craig C. Broyles
... word pair we see here. Thus, in language familiar to the ancients, Psalm 24 sings of Yahweh’s right to divine kingship. We can now also understand the point of verse one. What may sound to modern readers like a confession of Yahweh’s possessiveness is, in fact, a proclamation of victory and of liberty for the world, and all who live in it. The point is not that “the earth belongs to Yahweh” but that “to Yahweh the earth belongs,” not to chaos (this is the word order in the Hb. text). The issue ...

Understanding Series
Craig C. Broyles
... material terms (e.g., the blessings and curses of Deut. 28, the “two ways” of Proverbs and Ps. 1; cf. Ps. 128). Now Psalm 73 shows us that God personally is the reward of faith and relationship with him is its chief value. While God, in fact, may give evidence of his goodness in material terms, the only guarantee we have as believers is that he will evidence that goodness in personal terms. Psalm 73 is extraordinary among the psalms in that a resolution is won, but it does not consist in a deliverance ...

Understanding Series
Craig C. Broyles
... Likewise, the assurance that in the end he will look in triumph on his foes implies that “in the meantime” he may not. The promise here is not for a cushy life but for one upheld by God. 112:10 The final verse drives home the fact that righteousness is the only means for obtaining ultimate satisfaction. The wicked will see their longings . . . come to nothing. We may infer from this psalm that one can argue for righteous conduct not only on the grounds that it is right but also on “selfish” grounds ...

Matthew 19:16-30
Understanding Series
Robert H. Mounce
... of conflict or incongruity. The Gospels should be read with the same openness. The proverbial nature of Jesus’ teaching and the fact that the disciples heard him teach over a period of some years would lead us to expect variations on the same ... 26 Turning to his disciples, Jesus summarizes the incident by noting how difficult it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. In fact, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich [person] to enter the kingdom of God. Obviously ...

Understanding Series
Robert H. Mounce
... wife will a woman be who has married more than once fails to understand the true nature of eternal life. God is one who “calls into existence the things that do not exist” (Rom. 4:17, RSV). As for the resurrection, the Sadducees had not grasped the fact that when God, speaking from the burning bush, identified himself to Moses as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, he spoke not as the God of the dead but of the living. Jesus took the very Scriptures that the Sadducees accepted as binding and from them ...

Showing results