Dictionary: Trust
Showing 3201 to 3225 of 3543 results

Understanding Series
Craig A. Evans
... later period of Luke and his readers, however, the reference to being raised from the dead was understood as an allusion to Jesus’ resurrection. Just as his opponents had refused to hear and obey the words of Moses and the Prophets, so too would they reject the message of the risen Christ (as the Book of Acts gives eloquent testimony). (On the relation of the name Lazarus to the raising of Lazarus in John 11 see note on v. 20 below.) Additional Notes Evans (p. 49) suggests that the injunctions regarding ...

Understanding Series
Craig A. Evans
... the third time his impending passion, the reader would likely see a kingdom connotation here as well, since the glorious return of the Son of Man, at which time the kingdom of God is established in its fulness, can take place only after he has first suffered and been rejected (vv. 31–32; see 17:25). With 18:15 the evangelist Luke has resumed following his text of the Gospel of Mark. All three parts of this section are taken from Mark, and in the Marcan order (Mark 10:13–16, 17–31, 32–34). 18:15–17 ...

Understanding Series
Craig A. Evans
... in their respective infancy narratives is analogous.) Unlike the account of Jesus’ arrest, trial, and crucifixion where apologetic concerns made it necessary to give a more detailed and chronological account to explain why it was that Jesus the Messiah was rejected and put to death by his own people, there is no need for such a presentation in the case of the resurrection narratives. The resurrection narratives reveal fully distinctive emphases of the evangelists (see Grant R. Osborne, The Resurrection ...

Understanding Series
Craig A. Evans
... his suffering (v. 26). Jesus, beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, then explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself (v. 27). This conversation, and the similar one in vv. 44–49, allows Luke to show that Jesus’ rejection and death, though not in keeping with popular expectation, were in fulfillment of Scripture. The idea of scriptural fulfillment, then, is reflected in the birth narratives in Luke 1–2 and now again in the resurrection narratives of Luke 24. 24:28–32 ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... –25) one is struck by the fact that Abraham repeatedly stood before the dilemma of believing in God’s promise of a son in spite of circumstances to the contrary: Abraham’s old age, Sarah’s barrenness, Eliezer’s ineligibility, Ishmael’s rejection, and always, the interminable waiting. And yet, despite the obstacles and setbacks, Abraham is nonetheless called by God to believe. There is nothing that Abraham can do—although he tries in vain to assist the fulfillment of the promise in the Eliezer ...

Romans 5:1-11
Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... speak of the cross, for the cross is the constitutive criterion of salvation. Whoever thinks God begrudges the world a pittance of goodwill finds that notion dispelled forever by verse 8. Christ did not die of natural causes. In the face of animosity and rejection he offered his life as a supreme sacrifice for us. The Greek preposition translated for means “on behalf of.” Unlike most prepositions, this one is concrete: Jesus took our place. It is one thing to say Christ died; quite another to say Christ ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... assert universal salvation, however. In verse 17 Paul spoke of “those who receive God’s grace and righteousness.” Salvation by grace is not salvation by fiat, much less coercion. Grace is only grace where it grants the other freedom to receive—or reject—Christ’s self-sacrifice for forgiveness at the cross. The typological balance continues in verse 19 where Paul introduces a new set of contrasts, Adam’s disobedience and Christ’s obedience. Adam’s fall was not due to an oversight, lapse, or ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... who died for sin. The freedom created by grace leads not to license but to obedience. Obedience honors God’s boundless love and responds to that love in the freedom which love creates. 6:2 Paul counters the rhetorical question of verse 1 with a categorical rejection, By no means! Christ came to free us from our vices, not to feed them. Another rhetorical question sums up the contrast between Adam and Christ in a principle which deflates the swollen error of verse 1. We died to sin; how can we live in ...

Understanding Series
James R. Edwards
... a contrast between the old and new covenants, or law and grace, but that would overlook an important nuance of the argument. Paul does not contrast the law with the Spirit exactly, but the written code with the Spirit. In the next verse he emphatically rejects the idea that the law is sin (7:7), and later adds that the law is holy (7:12) and spiritual (7:14). By the written code he evidently understands the scrupulous interpretation of the Torah characteristic of the rabbinic tradition, the “tradition of ...

1 Corinthians 2:6-16
Understanding Series
Marion L. Soards
... , Paul vigorously denounces human wisdom as an inadequate avenue to understanding God. Mere reason does not bring humanity into a true relationship with God and the transforming power of God’s work. Indeed, without the Spirit humanity resists or rejects as foolishness the revelations of the Spirit (the things that come from the Spirit of God). The Spirit alone provides perception that enlightens and transforms humanity by bringing the human into a divinely initiated relationship with God. And, finally ...

Understanding Series
Marion L. Soards
... M. D. Hooker (“Hard Sayings: 1 Corinthians 3:2,” Theology 69 [1966], pp. 19–22) observes that Paul’s meat and milk differed little, but the capacity of the Corinthians to digest determined what they ate. What they took for meat, Paul rejected as inappropriate fare. 3:2b–3 Paul’s apocalyptically structured worldview lies behind the distinctions he makes in these lines. Although the Corinthians had received the Spirit, they were still attached to this age rather than to God’s Spirit-created new ...

Understanding Series
Marion L. Soards
... from the dead) did not deal with the sins of the Corinthians. Thus, anyone in Christ who died simply perished. Paul’s argument has led the Corinthians to an undesirable conclusion, quite deliberately. 15:19 One can read this verse as Paul’s response to or rejection of a statement that the Corinthians made (only for this life we have hope in Christ), but in the wake of the argument generated in verses 16–18, it is more likely that Paul is driving home the unacceptable nature of the conclusions that he ...

Understanding Series
Robert W. Wall
... ; Zech. 12:10) to interpret Christian hope in a manner similar to Matthew 24:30: the dramatic return of the Son of Man vindicates Christian faith before a cosmic courtroom. John does not say whether the lament, which issues forth from those who have rejected Christian faith, then results in repentance and a universal salvation; however, such a notion is not inappropriate to John (cf. Rev. 15:3–4; John 12:30–33). 1:8 John concludes his initial salutation to the seven churches with an oracle from God that ...

Understanding Series
Robert W. Wall
... who remain loyal to him the right to rule with him in the messianic kingdom. Jesus identifies them as rulers over an eschatological Israel, in contra-distinction to the leaders of “official Judaism” who have relinquished their right to rule by their rejection of him as Messiah. The significance of Jesus’ use of “throne” in the passion narrative, then, is twofold: first, it signifies that the eschatological Israel of God consists of only those who are faithful to God’s Christ (Luke 22:28; cf ...

Revelation 7:1-8
Understanding Series
Robert W. Wall
... a fallen world must be reversed and transformed before the good intentions of their creator are realized. Of course, it should be said at this point that human sinfulness is more than rebellion against the creator; human sin is also the irrational rejection of those things that the creator intended for our good. The good news is that through the exalted Lamb God has announced the availability of that transforming power necessary to redeem all humanity and to restore all creation. This gospel interprets the ...

Understanding Series
Robert W. Wall
... all creatures, the angels are dressed in priestly vestments—in clean, shining linen and … golden sashes around their chests. Rather than the mediation of covenantal blessing for the saints, their task will be the mediation of the wrath of God for those who reject God and follow the Evil One. God’s destruction of the anti-Christian kingdom is not arbitrary; it is justified by divine revelation in creation, in Torah, and finally in Christ. The four living creatures are also a part of John’s vision ...

Understanding Series
W. H. Bellinger, Jr.
... -tailed sheep are well known in Jewish tradition. The conclusion of this section refers to the sacrifice as lekhem, food or “bread.” Milgrom suggests that the word is a fossil harkening back to earlier times when sacrifices were to feed the gods, a practice rejected by the Hebrew Bible (Leviticus 1–16, p. 213). This use of lekhem is unusual, but it may emphasize that God is also present with worshipers in the festive sacrificial meal made from the part of the fellowship offering that is not turned. 3 ...

Understanding Series
W. H. Bellinger, Jr.
... or spirit or demon in the early practice of this ritual. By the time the Priestly tradition was collected, the term would have lost that connotation. The goat is being returned to an “evil one,” in keeping with the sin it bears. Some interpreters reject that view because of the fierce aversion to idolatry in the OT, which is reflected in the very next chapter of Leviticus. Some of these interpreters connect the word with the verb meaning “to depart” and thus think of “the goat of removal” or ...

Understanding Series
W.H. Bellinger, Jr.
... reconciliation and the averting of danger. Aaron the priest stood between the living and the dead. Numbers 3–4 laid out the places and duties of priests and Levites. Chapter 16 affirms that order for the organization of the community and rejects violations of the order, a theme which continues in the next chapters. Additional Notes 16:1–50 The Priestly tradents have incorporated earlier narrative material into their recounting of the history of this period. Apparently an early narrative of a Reubenite ...

Understanding Series
W.H. Bellinger, Jr.
... . Israel then turns away. Edom fears Israel and may have experienced difficulties with such groups before, but Israel turned aside with a minimum of conflict. Unlike the reunion of Jacob and Esau in Genesis, this encounter between Israel and Edom results in rejection. After the disobedience of Moses and Aaron and with no divine instructions, have the Priestly tradents included this account as an example of a failed mission and further delay that is part of the death of the wilderness generation? 20:22–29 ...

Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... Samuel’s God, then these verses speak strongly against that view. They all are chosen by God. Whatever evil they have done, the important thing is to wholeheartedly serve the LORD from this point on. They have not yet reached the situation where God is about to reject his people, and they are his people. The language again closely reflects that of Deuteronomy (e.g., Deut. 6:2, 5; 7:7; 10:12, 21; 11:16; 31:6). The point is that they must remember all that is implied in being God’s people. And ...

Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... to the same temptation to manipulate God’s blessing. It is not obvious what Saul’s sin was or why it was considered so much more serious than the various sins that David committed. The writers seem more concerned that readers understand that Saul was rejected than to explain the reason. The attempt to extend his power to include a priestly role as well as a military one might have encouraged later kings to add priestly power to their royal authority, and that could not be tolerated. Or his sin could ...

Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... was not to be blamed on any inadequacy in God’s choice. It is possible that alongside this apologetic motivation is a further reflection that, in the case of human beings, all power corrupts. 16:1–3 Samuel’s grief that Saul had been rejected links this chapter with the previous one, but again it is not explained. Probably alongside the personal sorrow for Saul, Samuel felt a regret that the change in the system that he had reluctantly endorsed had not been successful. The call from God in verse ...

1 Samuel 21:1-9
Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... 23:6). Thus Saul’s actions again defeated his purposes and went further toward separating himself from contact with God. David now had the use of the ephod available to him and Saul did not—further evidence, perhaps, of God’s ongoing support for David and rejection of Saul. The brief mention of the prophet Gad in 22:5 and this reference to the ephod reinforce the impression that God’s servants, both priest and prophet, had abandoned Saul and were behind David. Additional Notes 21:1 Nob had become a ...

Understanding Series
Mary J. Evans
... of the delegation would have been to renew the terms of the agreement. In this case, Hanun’s suspicion of the motives of David’s ambassadors would have been unjust but understandable. He did not want vassal status to remain, and he rejected David’s kindness, which presupposed some kind of relationship. His actions, however, were less than wise, given David’s growing reputation. Hanun not only sent the delegation away without agreeing to any terms but also insulted them. Shaving off half the beard ...