Dictionary: Trust
Showing 3001 to 3025 of 3543 results

Teach the Text
Joe M. Sprinkle
... than envying the Aaronites, Korah and the other Levites should consider their high privilege of caring for the holy things of the tabernacle. God had specifically designated Aaron and his sons alone to be the priests (Exod. 28:1; Lev. 8:1–3). Thus, rejecting the Aaronic priesthood constitutes defying the revealed will of God, and not Aaron. 16:12  Dathan and Abiram. These are Reubenites mentioned in verse 1. On is strangely omitted here. Had On dropped out of the rebellion? We will not come! Dathan and ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... judgment against Saul proved to be reliable, but so is his promise to place David on the throne of Israel. David seeks the Lord’s guidance and waits on divine providence. The Lord in turn brings to realization the promise he has stated in conjunction with his rejection of Saul (1 Sam. 13:14; 15:28) and has reiterated on several occasions through various voices (20:15; 21:11; 23:17; 24:20; 25:28; 26:25; 28:17). For the exiles, suffering the humiliation of defeat, this is encouraging. The Lord has promised ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... this respect, this chapter and those that follow contribute, oddly enough, to the narrator’s apology for David. Yes, David disobeys the Lord and is severely punished for his crimes, but in contrast to the Lord’s treatment of Saul, the Lord does not reject his dynasty or remove him from the throne. Indeed, the fact that David’s throne remains secure, in spite of his heinous sin and its consequences, is proof of God’s commitment to him. Historical and Cultural Background When David’s baby dies, he ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... of Gibeah (Judg. 19:23) is structurally identical to Tamar’s words to Amnon (2 Sam. 13:12). This expression (“No, my brother[s]!” plus a prohibition) occurs nowhere else in the Old Testament but in these two texts. 5. Both Amnon and the men of Gibeah reject the warning given to them (Judg. 19:25; 2 Sam. 13:14, 16). 6. After raping Tamar, Amnon callously tells her, “Get up and get out!” (2 Sam. 13:15). His words (qum and halak) echo the Levite’s statement to his concubine the morning after her ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... the Lord is manipulating the minds of Absalom and his men, causing them to prefer the desperate, inferior plan offered by Hushai, because he has already determined to bring disaster upon Absalom (17:14). This is reminiscent of the account of Eli’s sons, who rejected their father’s warning because the Lord had by that time decided to kill them (1 Sam. 2:25; see as well 1 Kings 12:15). Teaching the Text The Lord vindicates his humble, chosen servants when they are unjustly threatened. David is vulnerable ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... of Saul and his descendants. Now 2 Samuel 24 supplements 2 Samuel 11–20, which describes David’s moral failure and its negative consequences for the nation. Despite his sin and chastisement by the Lord, David remains the Lord’s chosen servant and is not rejected as Saul was. In 2 Samuel 24 he sins and endures the horrible consequences of his action. But David successfully intercedes for the people, who are dying as punishment for his own sin, and his position as leader of the nation remains intact ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... elements of religion in a manipulative attempt to secure divine favor. Thus the story contributes to the author’s strategy of demonstrating David’s superiority to Saul. While David is linked literarily with Samuel, Saul proves to be like Eli and his sons. God rejects the houses of both Eli and Saul. This story is instructive for the exiles. Before the exile, Israel takes God’s presence for granted, thinking that Jerusalem will never be destroyed because God lives in the city (Jer. 6:13–14; 8:11; 14 ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... ) prayer becomes important in 1 Samuel. The Lord responds to Samuel’s prayer here and to David’s at Keilah (23:4), but Samuel warns that the Lord will not respond to the cries of disobedient Israel (8:18), nor does he answer the rejected Saul (28:6). 7:10  the Lord thundered. See above, under “Historical and Cultural Background.” and threw them into such a panic. The use of this verb (hamam) links this event with earlier instances of the Lord’s supernatural intervention on behalf of Israel ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... is linked with his father’s, and they eventually die together on the battlefield (1 Sam. 31). Interpretive Insights 13:16  Saul and his son Jonathan. The reference to Jonathan as Saul’s son is ironic in light of the fact that the Lord has just rejected Saul’s dynasty (vv. 13–14). Earlier in the chapter, Jonathan is mentioned twice (vv. 2–3) but not identified as Saul’s son. The narrator waits to identify him as such until after Samuel’s announcement, as if to draw attention to the tragic ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... ; 18:24). But if one is teaching or preaching through 1 Samuel, the real point of the story lies elsewhere. Throughout this section of the book, the narrator is validating David’s claim to the throne of Israel and demonstrating that God has rejected Saul. As noted above, Saul disobeys God and resists his plan, while Jonathan submits to God and embraces his chosen servant. The point of the story—and of Jonathan’s friendship with David, when contrasted with his father’s hostility toward him—is this ...

1 Sam 21:1–22:5
Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... escaped (chaps. 18–19), once through the Lord’s direct intervention (19:23–24). Apparently unaware of Saul’s latest attempts to kill David (19:9–24), Jonathan was confident that his father would not harm David (cf. 19:6–7). But when Saul rejected Jonathan’s latest attempt to defend his friend, and Jonathan had to dodge one of his father’s spears (20:30–33), Jonathan realized the truth and warned David. The situation looked bleak for David, but he still had a devoted friend and protector ...

Teach the Text
Robert B. Chisholm Jr.
... (24:10; 26:23). But God will not give David into Saul’s hand. 23:16  helped him find strength in God. Once more, using the witness of Saul’s own son and heir apparent, the narrator emphasizes the Lord’s choice of David and his rejection of Saul. 23:18  The two of them made a covenant. This is the third covenantal transaction involving David and Jonathan. On the first occasion, Jonathan took the initiative to make the agreement (20:8). He pledged his loyalty to David and promised to protect him ...

Teach the Text
Daniel J. Estes
... meaning “curse” in 1:5, when Job offers sacrifices for his children in case they have sinned and cursed God in their hearts. 1:12 everything he has is in your power. Because Yahweh alone is God and the supreme sovereign over all, he could reject the adversary’s challenge outright. As a created being, the adversary is not Yahweh’s equal and he cannot compel Yahweh to do anything. Yahweh, however, does not duck the challenge but allows the adversary to touch Job’s possessions. At this time, Yahweh ...

Teach the Text
Daniel J. Estes
... they falsely suppose that when they die, wisdom will die with them. Job’s caustic words and disgusted tone suggest that the friends are wise in their own eyes alone (cf. Prov. 3:7) and not in reality. 12:3  Who does not know all these things? Rejecting Zophar’s insult in 11:12, Job insists that he is not inferior to them in his understanding, despite what they think. He describes what they have said as mere platitudes rather than genuine insight. Because Job is confident of his own grasp of wisdom, he ...

Teach the Text
Daniel J. Estes
... , Bildad views Job’s situation as a generic case study of retribution, not as the unique, personal tragedy that it is. Bildad’s rigid thinking, therefore, leaves him little room to encourage Job. Bildad begins with a strong retort against Job (18:1–4), rejecting as nonsense what Job has said. The major portion of Bildad’s speech (18:5–21) is a lecture; he contends that the world functions as a machine in which wickedness is always judged by God. In this speech, Bildad considers only the negative ...

Teach the Text
Daniel J. Estes
... where they do not belong. Job as much as tells them to mind their own business and leave him alone. 19:6–7  then know that God has wronged me. In this chapter, Job feels wronged both by his friends (19:3) and by God (19:6). Rejecting Bildad’s earlier implication that God does not pervert justice (8:3), Job perceives God as breaking his own righteous rules in how he treats Job. Despite Job’s scream of outrage (19:7), God seems to dodge acquitting Job, and he keeps Job hanging for a resolution ...

Teach the Text
Daniel J. Estes
Big Idea: God’s justice draws Job toward confidence, but God’s sovereignty intimidates him. Understanding the Text In Job 23, Job rejects what Eliphaz has just said in the previous chapter, when he counseled Job to “submit to God and be at peace with him” (22:21). This is yet another indicator that the communication between Job and his friends is breaking down. Instead of speaking directly either to his friends or ...

Teach the Text
Daniel J. Estes
... certainly assured that he will do abundantly more for us. The very humbling news, however, is that his response to our needs isn’t merely about us; it also takes due consideration of sparrows, ibex, nations, and distant nebulae, all giving glory to him. God will never reject us by telling us he has bigger fish to fry, but he will also never tell us that the world revolves around us. Even a cursory glance around the created world ought to let us know we are not in charge or fully “in the know.” Science ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... which carries much lighter baggage than “blessed,” since the life of the righteous is a life over which the Lord watches. The nouns “wicked,” “sinners,” and “mockers” are essentially synonyms, but the fact that the final term describes those who not merely reject God’s law but “mock” it may suggest some progression in meaning. 1:2  whose delight is in the law of the Lord. The noun “law” (or Torah) comes from a verb (yrh) that means “to teach.” (1) Thus torah sometimes means ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... :3). In this instance it is another way for the Lord to say, “I chose Jacob, but I did not choose Esau.” However, our present text is not exactly the same, for it pits God against evil, and the verbs “hate” and “detest” suggest God’s absolute rejection of evil because it is the opposite of his nature. Another psalmist views his life in harmony with God’s nature when he says, “Do I not hate those who hate you, Lord?” (139:21). The ancients did not distinguish between the “sin” and the ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... and a promise, as Weiser observes,[15] for the Lord has said, “But if from there [exile] you seek the Lord your God, you will find him if you seek him with all your heart and with all your soul” (Deut. 4:29). 27:9  Do not reject me or forsake me, God my Savior. Sometimes there is a psychological benefit in asking God not to do what we know he would never do. We need recurring affirmation. Weiser captures the tension here between faith and uncertainty: “It is precisely the blending of divine judgment ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... , whether from the standpoint of God’s character or that of our character, which should imitate God’s. However, the idea of the psalmist hating those who hate God is found also in 139:21–22. The idea seems to be that he “rejects” the idolaters. The Hebrew syntax heightens the contrast between the idolaters and the suppliant: “But as for me—in the Lord I trust.” The verb “trust” (bth) normally takes an object preceded by the preposition b (“in”), suggesting “adhering to,” but here ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... bow was usually made of wood or an animal’s horn. The sword was the most common weapon of ancient Israel and made of bronze or iron; most likely this is the short, straight-bladed sword.10Compare Psalms 20:7; 33:16. 44:9  But now you have rejected and humbled us.Up through 44:8, the poem sounds like a victory celebration, but with verse 9 the present and perplexing reality sets in, “but now”—that is, the present situation defies our understanding of what we know about God from the past. Psalm 44:9 ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... (also translated as “pit” or “dungeon”; see Pss. 16:10; 30:9; Isa. 38:17; 51:14). Here it means death. 49:10  the foolish and the senseless also perish.The “foolish” one “is not a half-wit” but someone who “deliberately rejects the wisdom.”5The “senseless” one is someone who lacks understanding (Prov. 30:2). These two terms occur in parallel in Psalm 92:6. 49:11  Their tombs will remain their houses forever. “Their tombs” is singular in Hebrew. The Greek text (LXX), Syriac ...

Teach the Text
C. Hassell Bullock
... is strong, it can actually regenerate the tree if the aboveground structure is destroyed. For these reasons, the trees can live to an old age. The contrast David makes in verses 5 (uprooted tree to describe the wicked) and 8 (olive tree to describe the righteous) is the difference between rejecting God and putting your trust in God.